Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp71884imm; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:33:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdb8K1leLPQFAsMIYjCbm6BctuhMq28zEglsXwzgMYZUEIf6isiynlie4ty3nS/C3qx+cbsW X-Received: by 2002:a63:7e1c:: with SMTP id z28-v6mr38640874pgc.246.1537493637371; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:33:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1537493637; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xTBRqkPoNLGauJcNhNmjy+E4nyeIuqFSG3DqvTuicgN19PFP5yYMWrbWzgBFowK7J2 oKEB2X9VKYdWnQnzeUPDn8KxB5ahs+VoeuQJq3ThlrhkArT4PVdPX9KrTnl4EmGa0iwE FsLyxKBrXODO77g8nkLpoXp48QksoOTJSII8cejk2D3eCtNKlB7jhW9yOCL456YZmlDH jEqw8CHygIwqCr8hm/hgPk69e/sO/D6IUr7htbDoAG9hG7hqdm02cXEe83m4VJrOHbWG k40OqkHwX59u4mQwpAeEd8Ex7Fp7SWqZeQ8TEZgHoxn1NscmbbO+8lpYbnSYbus7BYYn KULA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=axwLXS+2JqPHFh0l1jCSiQip5tTLd3PnktK7kGNQwWs=; b=lBrAIRKX+zbMzhcAB7zIL6oyMia7xQgd8P1NOXIxQQCyo13Hn9+2Ju6VYeqmDKr4b6 2xhtIKEcchD3DnYGr9bDknkpiaKSIgN5ATMqs+qMeE8d2aHmFNuarXCRb4apYtMf3IuP SOvUU8n89ncNR+KW4tBfV06mh+kImr91e7cNBUQSeQuWB1/TBJHWeRIOKDCyzyE5GMF7 ntgL0TlFzARI2opZ6IQT9FSjoi+RUTATTAL6CdHWhqtkrfJgcrYTxzbaKZLPvPXlSXlN x3YIyUaq0xOuN0q1jigcN6R/V91NgUGEhhUS6VhZ+sUoDB1iYPu/1HLkGXN9AxIiFUxl bjyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v6-v6si24565532pgj.463.2018.09.20.18.33.41; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388752AbeIUHTz (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:19:55 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:54810 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725828AbeIUHTz (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:19:55 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id AC4E49E1DB295; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 09:33:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.31.96) by DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 09:33:26 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/22] net: fix return type of ndo_start_xmit function To: David Miller References: <20180920123306.14772-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <20180920.085055.1188796939437872993.davem@davemloft.net> CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , From: YueHaibing Message-ID: <83d29681-b008-9b1f-5961-e23f0174d5f4@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 09:33:24 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180920.085055.1188796939437872993.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.31.96] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/9/20 23:50, David Miller wrote: > From: YueHaibing > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:32:44 +0800 > >> The method ndo_start_xmit() is defined as returning an 'netdev_tx_t', >> which is a typedef for an enum type, so make sure the implementation in >> this driver has returns 'netdev_tx_t' value, and change the function >> return type to netdev_tx_t. > > I would advise you not to send so many of these changes as a group. > > If one of the patches needs feedback addressed, which is already the > case, you will have to resubmit the entire series all over again with > the fixes. > Yes, I will send it separately after test and review again. Thank you for your advice. > . >