Message-ID: <3FB81B0D.8010009@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:49:17 -0800
From: walt <wa1ter@myrealbox.com>
Organization: none
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031108
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air
References: <fa.gj5f2rq.1u42v9u@ifi.uio.no> <fa.d7qik9h.1q644ip@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <fa.d7qik9h.1q644ip@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 926
Lines: 21

Sven Dowideit wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 04:43, Larry McVoy wrote:
> 
>>The points are
>>    a) I'm not at all convinced this is going to make anyone other than you
>>       happy.  They all want a BK replacement, not a tarball+patch replacement.

> ...so all I'd like is to be able to do a get/update to the head revision of
> the repository, and if possible get/convert to a tagged version. 
> 
> having the second would have made chasing down what version of the
> kernel broke my pcmcia support easier :)

Just a MeeToo for the record.  Of course, I'm perfectly happy using the free
full-version of bk for pulling from Linus's tree, but I don't use all the other
functions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/