Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263057AbTKPREs (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:04:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263062AbTKPREr (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:04:47 -0500 Received: from gprs145-223.eurotel.cz ([160.218.145.223]:2176 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263057AbTKPREo (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:04:44 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:05:09 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: mfedyk@matchmail.com, reiser@namesys.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Debian Kernels was: 2.6.0test9 Reiserfs boot time "buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431" Message-ID: <20031116170509.GB201@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20031029141931.6c4ebdb5.akpm@osdl.org> <20031101233354.1f566c80.akpm@osdl.org> <20031102092723.GA4964@gondor.apana.org.au> <20031102014011.09001c81.akpm@osdl.org> <20031116130558.GB199@elf.ucw.cz> <20031116151522.6ef9d2e1.skraw@ithnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031116151522.6ef9d2e1.skraw@ithnet.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1655 Lines: 45 Hi! > > If distribution had all packages unmodified, it would be useless... > > Just contrary I'd state that this would be the "perfect world", because this > would mean all projects are in perfect shape and all patches have gone to the > respective maintainers. Okay, in the perfect world we'd have just one distribution with all packages unmodified. Well.. but we are not there yet. > > So I'd expect all distros to have at least some changes in their > > kernel... the same way I expect distros to have some patches in > > midnight commander etc. > > So you say midnight commanders' maintainer is an a**hole, or what? > If you think some project needs patches, then please talk to its Debian having diffs vs. vanilla midnight does not mean anything negative about its maintainer: Debian well may want different default config, for example (F3 viewer bindings came to mind). > > Of course it is good to keep the .diff as small as possible. > > diffsize small is wanted. > diffsize zero is unwanted. > What kind of a logic is that? > > Forgive me Pavel, that does not sound thoughtful to me. If there's bug in the package, I expect Debian to fix the bug and then forward bugfix to the maintainer. Distribution does not want to wait for maintainer to ACK, especially if its security-related bug. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/