Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263024AbTKPR2Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:28:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263062AbTKPR2Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:28:25 -0500 Received: from h80ad26be.async.vt.edu ([128.173.38.190]:20108 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263024AbTKPR2Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:28:24 -0500 Message-Id: <200311161727.hAGHRbLa028984@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: Pavel Machek Cc: Stephan von Krawczynski , mfedyk@matchmail.com, reiser@namesys.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Debian Kernels was: 2.6.0test9 Reiserfs boot time "buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:05:09 +0100." <20031116170509.GB201@elf.ucw.cz> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20031029141931.6c4ebdb5.akpm@osdl.org> <20031101233354.1f566c80.akpm@osdl.org> <20031102092723.GA4964@gondor.apana.org.au> <20031102014011.09001c81.akpm@osdl.org> <20031116130558.GB199@elf.ucw.cz> <20031116151522.6ef9d2e1.skraw@ithnet.com> <20031116170509.GB201@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_2037539920P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:27:36 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1290 Lines: 36 --==_Exmh_2037539920P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:05:09 +0100, Pavel Machek said: > Okay, in the perfect world we'd have just one distribution with all > packages unmodified. Well.. but we are not there yet. Then why do we have a -mm kernel and a -ac kernel and a.....? It's interesting that we've apparently decided that Andrew Morton or Alan Cox or any of the other -initial kernel streams are allowed to have different goals (and thus different code to achieve those goals) but we seem to think that distributions are not allowed to do the same thing... -exec-shield is OK if it shows up in Andrew's stuff, but not when it's in the RedHat from whence it came? What's wrong with THAT? --==_Exmh_2037539920P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE/t7OIcC3lWbTT17ARArYyAKDaCNJROBWucr6VawggWxts3inNyQCcC2xg eGYV5gFsnswaCOr10YyPtks= =qqXr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_2037539920P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/