Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:58:06 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Zong Li <zongbox@gmail.com>
Cc:     palmer@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, vincentc@andestech.com,
        zong@andestech.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] RISC-V: Build tishift only on 64-bit
Message-ID: <20180921065806.GA8401@infradead.org>
References: <cover.1537260207.git.zongbox@gmail.com>
 <40c77db9ee2d23479ff90f2658539d29d7a30896.1537260207.git.zongbox@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40c77db9ee2d23479ff90f2658539d29d7a30896.1537260207.git.zongbox@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 05:19:13PM +0800, Zong Li wrote:
> Only RV64 supports 128 integer size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong@andestech.com>

This looks fine.  Just curious, what do we even need 128-bit integers
for on riscv64?  Did you see any issues if you drop it entirely?