Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp783744imm; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:14:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdbnd/GX1dtLdYi6FmpykEpB+nhv6cXrQz43aIDFbmz3dkhiB49HacIW2kPptk4eq5QkNKHc X-Received: by 2002:a63:2354:: with SMTP id u20-v6mr42343587pgm.122.1537542858404; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:14:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1537542858; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KX1LiHM8Vk1j0lYsFP3z43OfwH63xM3a1Sg6Ms+ACvSLA1B4e6TSn49nWqU4dBEUFi PO41yoGQRcrCiC9qRCNU1E4MJeNmy1SKErMqukgURT0Nd5QMNfiZyH5qyaviQWA1cUBE iWb3zwfYE0ZCGiTMfTUWefM+Q5Wa/wou8FB3BOfm53VDdcvYSEgkU/ED3qGWY8sSg1qn ITSbwY4cZx/mW1ETUdDDkS2cVWbSAq5SjIVnwuMflfzJekN/KUwVCzVj6dKUFSp7/Z5T 2aIELJxDkNrks9OIAa+HLatoDtAmo1fYQQ1umSC2Co1Ib6gCKfdqIJztdWiZnDb6d2Qi 3Wxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=zTtarEDYJFAJ15G4EkXt7q3hAoZWqXZZ+JIBsb4Teco=; b=jZb7uW05rV8/3pQDMtFmFzkusptSECHD6IppnZfMX2WagmHtb/LFAP3cg31K1nMbZ3 6ifsaXtEC4VQwuDOP/TnMr8fI8UZn0PS2v5faRmn6qVJtHSNfCY3nZokkr1Ma0fDMQue Ji3KVvr/qbOBbe6AxUv3TEy7NGBQrdhasuEC4BmW8MSP1Wuo8NspDePraQ2N77qjd2sc eLSEbV2ao56UE4iAaTNgDcFfB5WywQkmadvDbpJSjv5MAN7McMe1YtvW+6Bcv0xO38cC Jz154zHIYFg9M/tH/v5fyby1sd3qcPUN8fSpL/XVBkdTVSeN4ufjrbspOISXjlSsEr0/ 7yIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23-v6si25921571pgl.51.2018.09.21.08.14.01; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390764AbeIUVCE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:02:04 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:22409 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390357AbeIUU6H (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:58:07 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Sep 2018 08:08:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,285,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="71856543" Received: from 2b52.sc.intel.com ([143.183.136.51]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2018 08:08:47 -0700 From: Yu-cheng Yu To: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue Cc: Yu-cheng Yu Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 05/27] Documentation/x86: Add CET description Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:03:29 -0700 Message-Id: <20180921150351.20898-6-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20180921150351.20898-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> References: <20180921150351.20898-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Explain how CET works and the no_cet_shstk/no_cet_ibt kernel parameters. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu --- .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 + Documentation/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/x86/index.rst | 11 + Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst | 259 ++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 277 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index 92eb1f42240d..3854423f7c86 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -2764,6 +2764,12 @@ noexec=on: enable non-executable mappings (default) noexec=off: disable non-executable mappings + no_cet_ibt [X86-64] Disable indirect branch tracking for user-mode + applications + + no_cet_shstk [X86-64] Disable shadow stack support for user-mode + applications + nosmap [X86] Disable SMAP (Supervisor Mode Access Prevention) even if it is supported by processor. diff --git a/Documentation/index.rst b/Documentation/index.rst index 5db7e87c7cb1..1cdc139adb40 100644 --- a/Documentation/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/index.rst @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ implementation. :maxdepth: 2 sh/index + x86/index Filesystem Documentation ------------------------ diff --git a/Documentation/x86/index.rst b/Documentation/x86/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9c34d8cbc8f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/x86/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +======================= +X86 Documentation +======================= + +Control Flow Enforcement +======================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 1 + + intel_cet diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst b/Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..56e724fce920 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ +========================================= +Control Flow Enforcement Technology (CET) +========================================= + +[1] Overview +============ + +Control Flow Enforcement Technology (CET) provides protection against +return/jump-oriented programming (ROP) attacks. It can be implemented +to protect both the kernel and applications. In the first phase, +only the user-mode protection is implemented on the 64-bit kernel. +However, 32-bit applications are supported under the compatibility +mode. + +CET includes shadow stack (SHSTK) and indirect branch tracking (IBT). +The SHSTK is a secondary stack allocated from memory. The processor +automatically pushes/pops a secure copy to the SHSTK every return +address and, by comparing the secure copy to the program stack copy, +verifies function returns are as intended. The IBT verifies all +indirect CALL/JMP targets are intended and marked by the compiler with +'ENDBR' op codes. + +There are two kernel configuration options: + + INTEL_X86_SHADOW_STACK_USER, and + INTEL_X86_BRANCH_TRACKING_USER. + +To build a CET-enabled kernel, Binutils v2.31 and GCC v8.1 or later +are required. To build a CET-enabled application, GLIBC v2.28 or +later is also required. + +There are two command-line options for disabling CET features: + + no_cet_shstk - disables SHSTK, and + no_cet_ibt - disables IBT. + +At run time, /proc/cpuinfo shows the availability of SHSTK and IBT. + +[2] CET assembly instructions +============================= + +RDSSP %r + Read the SHSTK pointer into %r. + +INCSSP %r + Unwind (increment) the SHSTK pointer (0 ~ 255) steps as indicated + in the operand register. The GLIBC longjmp uses INCSSP to unwind + the SHSTK until that matches the program stack. When it is + necessary to unwind beyond 255 steps, longjmp divides and repeats + the process. + +RSTORSSP (%r) + Switch to the SHSTK indicated in the 'restore token' pointed by + the operand register and replace the 'restore token' with a new + token to be saved (with SAVEPREVSSP) for the outgoing SHSTK. + +:: + + Before RSTORSSP + + Incoming SHSTK Current/Outgoing SHSTK + + |----------------------| |----------------------| + addr=x | | ssp-> | | + |----------------------| |----------------------| + (%r)-> | rstor_token=(x|Lg) | addr=y-8 | | + |----------------------| |----------------------| + + After RSTORSSP + + |----------------------| |----------------------| + | | | | + |----------------------| |----------------------| + ssp-> | rstor_token=(y|Bz|Lg)| addr=y-8 | | + |----------------------| |----------------------| + + note: + 1. Only valid addresses and restore tokens can be on the + user-mode SHSTK. + 2. A token is always of type u64 and must align to u64. + 3. The incoming SHSTK pointer in a rstor_token must point to + immediately above the token. + 4. 'Lg' is bit[0] of a rstor_token indicating a 64-bit SHSTK. + 5. 'Bz' is bit[1] of a rstor_token indicating the token is to + be used only for the next SAVEPREVSSP and invalid for the + RSTORSSP. + +SAVEPREVSSP + Store the SHSTK 'restore token' pointed by + (current_SHSTK_pointer + 8). + +:: + + After SAVEPREVSSP + + |----------------------| |----------------------| + ssp-> | | | | + |----------------------| |----------------------| + | rstor_token=(y|Bz|Lg)| addr=y-8 | rstor_token(y|Lg) | + |----------------------| |----------------------| + +WRUSS %r0, (%r1) + Write the value in %r0 to the SHSTK address pointed by (%r1). + This is a kernel-mode only instruction. + +ENDBR + The compiler inserts an ENDBR at all valid branch targets. Any + CALL/JMP to a target without an ENDBR triggers a control + protection fault. + +[3] Application Enabling +======================== + +An application's CET capability is marked in its ELF header and can +be verified from the following command output, in the +NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 field: + + readelf -n + +If an application supports CET and is statically linked, it will run +with CET protection. If the application needs any shared libraries, +the loader checks all dependencies and enables CET only when all +requirements are met. + +[4] Legacy Libraries +==================== + +GLIBC provides a few tunables for backward compatibility. + +GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.tune.hwcaps=-SHSTK,-IBT + Turn off SHSTK/IBT for the current shell. + +GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.tune.x86_shstk= + This controls how dlopen() handles SHSTK legacy libraries: + on: continue with SHSTK enabled; + permissive: continue with SHSTK off. + +[5] CET system calls +==================== + +The following arch_prctl() system calls are added for CET: + +arch_prctl(ARCH_CET_STATUS, unsigned long *addr) + Return CET feature status. + + The parameter 'addr' is a pointer to a user buffer. + On returning to the caller, the kernel fills the following + information: + + *addr = SHSTK/IBT status + *(addr + 1) = SHSTK base address + *(addr + 2) = SHSTK size + +arch_prctl(ARCH_CET_DISABLE, unsigned long features) + Disable SHSTK and/or IBT specified in 'features'. Return -EPERM + if CET is locked. + +arch_prctl(ARCH_CET_LOCK) + Lock in CET feature. + +arch_prctl(ARCH_CET_ALLOC_SHSTK, unsigned long *addr) + Allocate a new SHSTK and put a restore token at top. + + The parameter 'addr' is a pointer to a user buffer and indicates + the desired SHSTK size to allocate. On returning to the caller, + the kernel fills *addr with the base address of the new SHSTK. + +arch_prctl(ARCH_CET_LEGACY_BITMAP, unsigned long *addr) + Allocate an IBT legacy code bitmap if the current task does not + have one. + + The parameter 'addr' is a pointer to a user buffer. + On returning to the caller, the kernel fills the following + information: + + *addr = IBT bitmap base address + *(addr + 1) = IBT bitmap size + +[6] The implementation of the SHSTK +=================================== + +SHSTK size +---------- + +A task's SHSTK is allocated from memory to a fixed size of +RLIMIT_STACK. + +Signal +------ + +The main program and its signal handlers use the same SHSTK. Because +the SHSTK stores only return addresses, we can use a large SHSTK to +cover the condition that both the program stack and the sigaltstack +run out. + +The kernel creates a restore token at the SHSTK restoring address and +verifies that token when restoring from the signal handler. + +Fork +---- + +The SHSTK's vma has VM_SHSTK flag set; its PTEs are required to be +read-only and dirty. When a SHSTK PTE is not present, RO, and dirty, +a SHSTK access triggers a page fault with an additional SHSTK bit set +in the page fault error code. + +When a task forks a child, its SHSTK PTEs are copied and both the +parent's and the child's SHSTK PTEs are cleared of the dirty bit. +Upon the next SHSTK access, the resulting SHSTK page fault is handled +by page copy/re-use. + +When a pthread child is created, the kernel allocates a new SHSTK for +the new thread. + +Setjmp/Longjmp +-------------- + +Longjmp unwinds SHSTK until it matches the program stack. + +Ucontext +-------- + +In GLIBC, getcontext/setcontext is implemented in similar way as +setjmp/longjmp. + +When makecontext creates a new ucontext, a new SHSTK is allocated for +that context with ARCH_CET_ALLOC_SHSTK the syscall. The kernel +creates a restore token at the top of the new SHSTK and the user-mode +code switches to the new SHSTK with the RSTORSSP instruction. + +[7] The management of read-only & dirty PTEs for SHSTK +====================================================== + +A RO and dirty PTE exists in the following cases: + +(a) A page is modified and then shared with a fork()'ed child; +(b) A R/O page that has been COW'ed; +(c) A SHSTK page. + +The processor only checks the dirty bit for (c). To prevent the use +of non-SHSTK memory as SHSTK, we use a spare bit of the 64-bit PTE as +DIRTY_SW for (a) and (b) above. This results to the following PTE +settings: + +Modified PTE: (R/W + DIRTY_HW) +Modified and shared PTE: (R/O + DIRTY_SW) +R/O PTE, COW'ed: (R/O + DIRTY_SW) +SHSTK PTE: (R/O + DIRTY_HW) +SHSTK PTE, COW'ed: (R/O + DIRTY_HW) +SHSTK PTE, shared: (R/O + DIRTY_SW) + +Note that DIRTY_SW is only used in R/O PTEs but not R/W PTEs. + +[8] The implementation of IBT +============================= + +The kernel provides IBT support in mmap() of the legacy code bit map. +However, the management of the bitmap is done in the GLIBC or the +application. -- 2.17.1