Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263420AbTKQJ01 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 04:26:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263423AbTKQJ01 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 04:26:27 -0500 Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:22029 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263420AbTKQJ0R (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 04:26:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:26:05 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] disallow modular BINFMT_ELF Message-ID: <20031117092605.B2035@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Garzik , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031115232600.GF7919@fs.tum.de> <3FB6BB35.8090001@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3FB6BB35.8090001@pobox.com>; from jgarzik@pobox.com on Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 06:48:05PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 703 Lines: 18 On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 06:48:05PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > modular BINFMT_ELF gives unresolved symbols in 2.4 . > > > > modular BINFMT_ELF gives the following unresolved symbols in 2.6: > > > Interesting. this causes me to wonder if we should bother making > BINFMT_ELF an option at all... And in addition to my previous post there's probably peopel who want only 32bit elf support on 64bit arches like paris64 and sparc64. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/