Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp551999imm; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 05:52:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63DFLo8REM2rUHj6c6L27Y5J/eCKCdXJZeRhwyQtFlRiqgfxL5fgLu9+ViSGYywm44CpHqF X-Received: by 2002:a63:c44a:: with SMTP id m10-v6mr2245493pgg.416.1537620727669; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 05:52:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1537620727; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bkpjSBXHh48SVq8MvzCXfl8l4VVfE0L8raxKEQ35TS3KB7B4wFFnBAE9eLWM1XWhGK 1khgE/7/M4Ah0J2+FwkuWI06uNCnYmDY9nJXIecUNTaDcPFk7c0fM68MQWYv7b+II228 +XDMZpbBK4Txo60HracfKaEpLjT79cJkIfFP6Dph8cBfxd0wjRnPFXIodjusW1zbtGjA a7nZEq91cjejUvNKvJxfVX63x2/THJ3yCmN3cnRksFEqPWk+w5iy/TSCapr0ifz9fWOS SU2hBfaSVPWRqIVCw+5y0jSIQq5vrkIOQjgJIdGfeiYLP5iycrfFPY0LZG8oxBItspzO 17Ag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:from:cc:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :user-agent:date; bh=29zXtqSbTA4EfcrfUJB/6UMaewh4m83rtIa/zVOw9kM=; b=Ncr/Tli4nhNlTnZYDSY+eIi+u/L8asy2ahL4Ey/LLQIydqGxNzaFisSpb4LajO5ElB aknnYK6Pf7lYPhnWQ4o8ewfTFwb8tXBo8hxmT2lK6eGrm6muqVW3Of0RmNEvX0VqsQJ4 iNXAdqnigBsQza/p15MLnMB/JArcE/lUEl1Sy6OVTcruEVxGMoHlOp1FDlmsRBOyeO/2 FmbEff7DWcPaL3/z6Mqjxd/4JW7ISsw+9LnhzUXUpkjLrbe7KMo8iStcty7yt4102fNW 7KAX7Inz39qeS6i2e1CtZS5FMgNfzHsjUAUTmr3fJJsAQ2FJJf6pY2i+n9cRnfLrFvXo 8P1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1-v6si31652750pfu.79.2018.09.22.05.51.52; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 05:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731454AbeIVSpB convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 22 Sep 2018 14:45:01 -0400 Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([46.235.226.198]:40590 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728934AbeIVSpB (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2018 14:45:01 -0400 Received: from [10.145.248.251] (82-132-247-97.dab.02.net [82.132.247.97]) by saturn.retrosnub.co.uk (Postfix; Retrosnub mail submission) with ESMTPSA id A78299E7639; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:51:29 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:51:22 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20180922114849.GA3890@himanshu-Vostro-3559> References: <1537447238-18674-2-git-send-email-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> <201809211544.zop1vk8B%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20180922113616.2d849fb0@archlinux> <20180922114849.GA3890@himanshu-Vostro-3559> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: at91: fix wrong channel number in triggered buffer mode To: Himanshu Jha , Jonathan Cameron CC: Eugen Hristev , ludovic.desroches@microchip.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, Maxime Ripard From: Jonathan Cameron Message-ID: <83D84516-8721-4712-B24B-7B1199FAFCC4@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22 September 2018 12:48:49 BST, Himanshu Jha wrote: >On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:36:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:03 +0800 >> kbuild test robot wrote: >> >> > Hi Eugen, >> This one is leaving me stumped... >> >> Anyone care to point out what I'm missing that is wrong here? >> >> Also Eugen, please don't cc stable on a patch directly. It is fine >to send >> a backport request once a patch has hit mainline, but before that >it's just >> adding noise to a list as they won't take it directly anyway. > >Song is correct on this one. > >So, just replace the declaration to: > > struct iio_chan_spec const *chan; > >and then warning goes away... Good point. Not enough coffee this morning.. Obvious now :) > >Another thing, its better not to reply the automated bot and instead to >the author by changing "From" address. :) > >That is what I do often when replying to that thread. > >https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180921182616.GA2077@himanshu-Vostro-3559/ > >And it nests properly in the given thread avoiding any noise to kbuild >bot. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.