Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 22 Sep 2018 17:37:25 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] Documentation: RCU: Fix rcu_preempt_state
 reference in stallwarn
Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com
References: <20180922234127.94970-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20180922234127.94970-3-joel@joelfernandes.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180922234127.94970-3-joel@joelfernandes.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Message-Id: <20180923003725.GK4222@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 07:41:27PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> rcu_preempt_state doesn't exist anymore. Update stallwarn documentation
> accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>

Good eyes, queued and pushed with edits, including fixing a grammar
nit in my original.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt
> index 491043fd976f..b6bc7a2a9961 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt
> @@ -176,9 +176,8 @@ causing stalls, and that the stall was affecting RCU-sched.  This message
>  will normally be followed by stack dumps for each CPU.  Please note that
>  PREEMPT_RCU builds can be stalled by tasks as well as by CPUs, and that
>  the tasks will be indicated by PID, for example, "P3421".  It is even
> -possible for a rcu_preempt_state stall to be caused by both CPUs -and-
> -tasks, in which case the offending CPUs and tasks will all be called
> -out in the list.
> +possible for a rcu_state stall to be caused by both CPUs -and- tasks,
> +in which case the offending CPUs and tasks will all be called out in the list.
>  
>  CPU 2's "(3 GPs behind)" indicates that this CPU has not interacted with
>  the RCU core for the past three grace periods.  In contrast, CPU 16's "(0
> -- 
> 2.19.0.444.g18242da7ef-goog
>