Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263561AbTKQQch (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:32:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263570AbTKQQch (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:32:37 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:38119 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263561AbTKQQcg (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:32:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:32:14 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Dan Creswell cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Hard lock on 2.6-test9 (More Info) In-Reply-To: <3FB8CE08.6070001@dcrdev.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1148 Lines: 30 On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Dan Creswell wrote: > > 17: 5267 3420 IO-APIC-level ohci1394, Intel ICH4, nvidia > > When I boot X under kernel 2.6, I see the additional nvidia interrupt > path as per the 2.4 output (which was taken whilst I was running X). > > But, within seconds of this additional interrupt assignment appearing, > 2.6 dies a horrible death whilst 2.4 just keeps on rolling. Two potential reasons: - the nvidia driver is just broken under 2.6.x - or a driver bug in ohci1394 _or_ the Intel ICH4 driver, which could become unhappy if they see a lot of interrupts that aren't for them (maybe it uncovers a race). You can test for the latter by just disabling those drivers, and seeing what happens. If it still breaks, it's nvidia. If the crashes stop, it might _still_ be nvidia, but at that point somebody else might start being interested in it. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/