Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 01:40:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 01:40:48 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:28174 "HELO postfix.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 01:40:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 02:55:59 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel To: george anzinger Cc: Paul Jakma , Szabolcs Szakacsits , Alan Cox , Stephen Clouse , Guest section DW , "Patrick O'Rourke" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init In-Reply-To: <3ABBC702.AC9C3C92@mvista.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, george anzinger wrote: > What happens if you just make swap VERY large? Does the system thrash > it self to a virtual standstill? It does. I need to implement load control code (so we suspend processes in turn to keep the load low enough so we can avoid thrashing). > Is this a possible answer? Supposedly you could then sneak in and > blow away the bad guys manually ... This certainly works. regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/