Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 03:46:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 03:45:56 -0500 Received: from relay03.cablecom.net ([62.2.33.103]:10765 "EHLO relay03.cablecom.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 03:45:48 -0500 Message-ID: <3ABC5E89.FB6A2C89@bluewin.ch> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 09:44:58 +0100 From: Otto Wyss Reply-To: otto.wyss@bluewin.ch X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Ford CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux should better cope with power failure In-Reply-To: <3ABB6B82.62293CAD@uni-mb.si> <3ABBA400.2AEC97E8@bluewin.ch> <3ABBD11D.FE20FB69@blue-labs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > No, the correct answer is if you want a reliable recovery then run your disks > in non write buffered mode. I.e. turn on sync in fstab. > You probably haven't tried to use sync or you would have noticed the performace penalty. I think nobody really considers sync an alternative. O. Wyss - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/