Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262228AbTKRA2K (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:28:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262225AbTKRA2K (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:28:10 -0500 Received: from ns.media-solutions.ie ([212.67.195.98]:47887 "EHLO mx.media-solutions.ie") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262196AbTKRA2C (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:28:02 -0500 Message-ID: <3FB96718.20103@media-solutions.ie> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:26:00 -0600 From: Keith Whyte User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: es-mx, es-es, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edgar Toernig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org, linux-admin@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.18 fork & defunct child. References: <1069053524.3fb87654286b5@ssl.buz.org> <3FB8E40F.EF61CA7@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <3FB8E40F.EF61CA7@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RelayImmunity: 212.67.195.98 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1747 Lines: 49 Edgar Toernig wrote: { strace listing deleted, see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106905386725308&w=2 } >That is not normal /bin/true behaviour. Sure your system >isn't hacked? Give the -f option to ptrace to see what the >forked process is trying to do... Compare the size of >/bin/true with a known-good one. > >Ciao, ET. > I'm not sure. I should be running tripwire or something, this is the only one of my systems that doesn't run such a thing, as i have the firewall locked down and have been busy. But it is true i accidently did iptables -F and it was left that way for a few days. But this happens with any program, not just /bin/true, also the /bin/true on the root and chroot systems are identical. and with much interest i discovered, that if i unmount /proc, the problem goes away. aggh. that is why it is not exhibiting itself in the chroot system, - no /proc. I also remember that when this first happen nearly a year ago, some "unix engineer" at the ISP said, oh yeah that's because something in the ext2 filesystem header is corrupted.. i don't quite remember what he said exactly, something that sounded so far fetched that i ignored it. does that ring any bells with anyone? please help, ug, i hate having a linux system that's not reliable. feels like having a pet that's in pain or something. btw, /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.2.5.so Keith (i'm cross-posting here to gcc and admin in the hopes of finding someone who has seen this, thanks!) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/