Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: block: DMA alignment of IO buffer allocated from slab
To:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <CACVXFVOBq3L_EjSTCoiqUL1PH=HMR5EuNNQV0hNndFpGxmUK6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180920063129.GB12913@lst.de> <87h8ij0zot.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
 <20180923224206.GA13618@ming.t460p>
 <38c03920-0fd0-0a39-2a6e-70cd8cb4ef34@virtuozzo.com>
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Message-ID: <20a20568-5089-541d-3cee-546e549a0bc8@acm.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:19:17 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <38c03920-0fd0-0a39-2a6e-70cd8cb4ef34@virtuozzo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 9/24/18 2:46 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 09/24/2018 01:42 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 03:04:18PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:15:43PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>>> 1) does kmalloc-N slab guarantee to return N-byte aligned buffer?  If
>>>>> yes, is it a stable rule?
>>>>
>>>> This is the assumption in a lot of the kernel, so I think if somethings
>>>> breaks this we are in a lot of pain.
> 
> This assumption is not correct. And it's not correct at least from the beginning of the
> git era, which is even before SLUB allocator appeared. With CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y
> the same as with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y kmalloc return 'unaligned' objects.
> The guaranteed arch-and-config-independent alignment of kmalloc() result is "sizeof(void*)".
> 
> If objects has higher alignment requirement, the could be allocated via specifically created kmem_cache.

Hello Andrey,

The above confuses me. Can you explain to me why the following comment 
is present in include/linux/slab.h?

/*
  * kmalloc and friends return ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN aligned
  * pointers. kmem_cache_alloc and friends return ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
  * aligned pointers.
  */

Thanks,

Bart.