Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp2665533imm; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:04:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62e3rr0drXYyDELLAWYQVumVq7+RmqRe/fmtIPjUt+QPYDZw+RK4NMHaPJOVP//n+t7oSYF X-Received: by 2002:a65:5c83:: with SMTP id a3-v6mr10072752pgt.164.1537801455354; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:04:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1537801455; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RWyGXeVE185rvLXvAHiBiTz74nJ/HohUfMtlbfQp9GPrSDsHqNLM7efGCrxuXWIfW2 PN7tU3Uu4nb/i8o06G75LYOGWcjvtkKbLlsi37srv0RS4wcs+wiLu6lQExK35buRknnk IS9L8mawOf/l/0Xnyxl8u1dMv7QsiNt4qkW2HzOQAFt8rtYNKOPy5AAJ2jWznyd1dZPw 8DpQKdJHBl92tXbUl+3IgL0FzHs2Y/liUXuj8CSnDZ2scLNXgI/W6bG2j8mc1QaGnEaj LhDO0rhq8YfXretosZq7o0HDXzx80D7DmNufD3gdRpW9bqjSd9pYwgypsJ0V1hajtCFA CfJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=C/sckC+7ybv33JUakJ8Pm/6w8VGWZtY+1XaURqjzo8o=; b=fkMWhAV7PtOza9nX2WyMSijrWILrbTM35N2fDUtt9INKlhpJpZoet56hmF33r9q+P3 537XGLDe1hW9W4hAIOPZ6/IJXkkHKnisZC0g0aN5ue+p40fP4tinmJ7NlVsfms7l+FH+ lhLgCaPBAtC40wMKb1iiMMAGa8tDjNML63JSUwKy+liCRFkfPIjKqiNX6m/IpcbUved9 naZvD4Zlv41CwCu6iejv3oZopcPToJ9YMSwF3+GetWsJ4Gq8KRx21E7gnn/eGY5enlkW MrIuWmTzHK0kB/wp+3y+XKdBDMGdKQpWS54FNiWU7kLHDui3543gKD6E8wHAvXqANhi4 y4og== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g10-v6si33857405plt.468.2018.09.24.08.03.58; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730056AbeIXU4x (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:56:53 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:55970 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728264AbeIXU4w (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:56:52 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8OEsInt020892 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:54:20 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.149]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2mq202rawc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:54:18 -0400 Received: from localhost by e31.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:54:09 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.18) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:54:06 -0600 Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.234]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w8OEs5SO43843620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:54:05 -0700 Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC33D6A047; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:54:05 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA57E6A054; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:54:00 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [9.79.212.223] (unknown [9.79.212.223]) by b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:54:00 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/21] tpm: factor out tpm_startup function To: Tomas Winkler , Jarkko Sakkinen , Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Alexander Usyskin , Tadeusz Struk , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180921135820.20549-1-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <20180921135820.20549-12-tomas.winkler@intel.com> From: Nayna Jain Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:21:10 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180921135820.20549-12-tomas.winkler@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18092414-8235-0000-0000-00000E05CD0D X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009763; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01092994; UDB=6.00564877; IPR=6.00873032; MB=3.00023482; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-09-24 14:54:09 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18092414-8236-0000-0000-000042C1688F Message-Id: <060a3dc0-046e-198c-f476-8c490140e9d6@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-09-24_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809240147 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/21/2018 07:28 PM, Tomas Winkler wrote: > TPM manual startup is used only from within TPM 1.x or TPM 2.x > code, hence remove tpm_startup() function from tpm-interface.c > and add two static functions implementations tpm1_startup() > and tpm2_startup() into to tpm1-cmd.c and tpm2-cmd.c respectively. > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkine Typo in Jarkko's last name -  "Sakkinen" Thanks & Regards,     - Nayna > --- > V2-V3: Resend. > V4: Fix the commit message. > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 41 ---------------------------------------- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 1 - > drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c > index dfa972bbdd81..686b5316dad5 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c > @@ -413,47 +413,6 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_transmit_cmd); > > -#define TPM_ORD_STARTUP 153 > -#define TPM_ST_CLEAR 1 > - > -/** > - * tpm_startup - turn on the TPM > - * @chip: TPM chip to use > - * > - * Normally the firmware should start the TPM. This function is provided as a > - * workaround if this does not happen. A legal case for this could be for > - * example when a TPM emulator is used. > - * > - * Return: same as tpm_transmit_cmd() > - */ > -int tpm_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip) > -{ > - struct tpm_buf buf; > - int rc; > - > - dev_info(&chip->dev, "starting up the TPM manually\n"); > - > - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) { > - rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_STARTUP); > - if (rc < 0) > - return rc; > - > - tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, TPM2_SU_CLEAR); > - } else { > - rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM_TAG_RQU_COMMAND, TPM_ORD_STARTUP); > - if (rc < 0) > - return rc; > - > - tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, TPM_ST_CLEAR); > - } > - > - rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, > - "attempting to start the TPM"); > - > - tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); > - return rc; > -} > - > int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { > if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS) > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > index 862c9262e037..fa88102a0cab 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > @@ -540,7 +540,6 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space, > void *buf, size_t bufsiz, > size_t min_rsp_body_length, unsigned int flags, > const char *desc); > -int tpm_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip); > int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *); > > int tpm1_pm_suspend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int tpm_suspend_pcr); > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c > index d118adbcd2a7..6deae4595277 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c > @@ -308,6 +308,40 @@ unsigned long tpm1_calc_ordinal_duration(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 ordinal) > return duration; > } > > +#define TPM_ORD_STARTUP 153 > +#define TPM_ST_CLEAR 1 > + > +/** > + * tpm_startup - turn on the TPM > + * @chip: TPM chip to use > + * > + * Normally the firmware should start the TPM. This function is provided as a > + * workaround if this does not happen. A legal case for this could be for > + * example when a TPM emulator is used. > + * > + * Return: same as tpm_transmit_cmd() > + */ > +static int tpm1_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip) > +{ > + struct tpm_buf buf; > + int rc; > + > + dev_info(&chip->dev, "starting up the TPM manually\n"); > + > + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM_TAG_RQU_COMMAND, TPM_ORD_STARTUP); > + if (rc < 0) > + return rc; > + > + tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, TPM_ST_CLEAR); > + > + rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, > + "attempting to start the TPM"); > + > + tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); > + > + return rc; > +} > + > int tpm1_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { > cap_t cap; > @@ -317,7 +351,7 @@ int tpm1_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip) > rc = tpm1_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT, &cap, NULL, > sizeof(cap.timeout)); > if (rc == TPM_ERR_INVALID_POSTINIT) { > - if (tpm_startup(chip)) > + if (tpm1_startup(chip)) > return rc; > > rc = tpm1_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT, &cap, > @@ -726,3 +760,4 @@ int tpm1_pm_suspend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int tpm_suspend_pcr) > > return rc; > } > + > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > index 65ce463a6f92..8da5a16e7c8c 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > @@ -943,6 +943,36 @@ static int tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(struct tpm_chip *chip) > return rc; > } > > +/** > + * tpm2_startup - turn on the TPM > + * @chip: TPM chip to use > + * > + * Normally the firmware should start the TPM. This function is provided as a > + * workaround if this does not happen. A legal case for this could be for > + * example when a TPM emulator is used. > + * > + * Return: same as tpm_transmit_cmd() > + */ > + > +static int tpm2_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip) > +{ > + struct tpm_buf buf; > + int rc; > + > + dev_info(&chip->dev, "starting up the TPM manually\n"); > + > + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_STARTUP); > + if (rc < 0) > + return rc; > + > + tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, TPM2_SU_CLEAR); > + rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, > + "attempting to start the TPM"); > + tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); > + > + return rc; > +} > + > /** > * tpm2_auto_startup - Perform the standard automatic TPM initialization > * sequence > @@ -954,7 +984,7 @@ int tpm2_auto_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { > int rc; > > - rc = tpm_get_timeouts(chip); > + rc = tpm2_get_timeouts(chip); > if (rc) > goto out; > > @@ -963,7 +993,7 @@ int tpm2_auto_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip) > goto out; > > if (rc == TPM2_RC_INITIALIZE) { > - rc = tpm_startup(chip); > + rc = tpm2_startup(chip); > if (rc) > goto out; >