Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262192AbTKRNIk (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:08:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262564AbTKRNIk (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:08:40 -0500 Received: from gprs147-139.eurotel.cz ([160.218.147.139]:2432 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262192AbTKRNIj (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:08:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:27:10 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Albert Cahalan Cc: Jens Axboe , P@draigBrady.com, Albert Cahalan , Herbert Xu , linux-kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq + io priorities Message-ID: <20031118092710.GA203@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1068469674.734.80.camel@cube> <3FAF9335.9010801@draigBrady.com> <20031110133746.GB32637@suse.de> <1068508372.734.116.camel@cube> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1068508372.734.116.camel@cube> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 744 Lines: 21 Hi! > I suppose the nice() wrapper in glibc could > be modified... but that's kind of silly when > the kernel is getting modified anyway. Perhaps modifying glibc is the right way after all. We do not want to have nice(), ionice() and then cpunice() as a kernel interface. OTOH it would be good to keep ionice() on the same scale as other "nice" values so that "do-it-all" interface is easier. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/