Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp2737649imm; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:07:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYFEcOniRWZJtra6lpZdAf8qpUivsNj6xLTlAs63yDcXDstW6sWF6fm0wxGDINCcgK+SO/R X-Received: by 2002:a62:8704:: with SMTP id i4-v6mr10978426pfe.62.1537805232771; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:07:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1537805232; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QLUJ/aSzg3zmxgK567ntqT2zPXKwxBRBmGT2dVpSI92JUu0Flrv6YdXaTwRE1shkeC n/XSNjqcRCEMYVnalBURrVesDs/bxlcq1rreR5+tKL1TXJbWqZzR2nmmzPQ36o0M4CRz r1WWvx+XdB8MbYNX2eAlNTZLVQwJaqks1WVa5C6ecuTz3jhgIliM3BDBJnxH07osWFha pmvJGn0xL2IvFjplpy6lcqXlk7OtQydflGnSZi4wEy7qKAAmSLH8AcG17QRhKm0aDpEZ sv45xwrjiJz8sTCPWgXS/RWsIyMy2IkmbkPxY8B6WNQBYswLykzZws6wcz4lfS1TG53t T0zQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:feedback-id:mime-version:user-agent :references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=m36IuC4SSWmPbuUUSbySi1AroM1Tp0AcBBRKWyZjoaU=; b=trvxjY9jHPOGrxbImelhCRQHb0P6eXbr30I6KNrs/ADWaqi+F6fI/6kHB9/qncR4NA qX3Ebpa98crVIEu6ZacEOdUFIT/NrFnB449QmwqlSmZXt5gOY2rSDLV/AdSneoWpR0+q T9+eMIkmek3JEf1gHs8tQmYxODq5WS9WJ/WBjHC3DzCVA9IZ38nRT0NfPpjugCVsYByF 5eW95p5aJLcfDN5/lmi581Ls+GxXrncveAb53IPnmvbvgWYKQf1KCsvMNEdSFFf/hlaf QVk6LUCKeOFKxkcuErIus76K6S7lH+kozUbeN5aSaX7ScWbIphAgg64M8O1XUuVBsvoh e1aA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amazonses.com header.s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug header.b=FbEjlp1T; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i28-v6si37125109pfi.105.2018.09.24.09.06.56; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amazonses.com header.s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug header.b=FbEjlp1T; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731074AbeIXWJU (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:09:20 -0400 Received: from a9-46.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.9.46]:39652 "EHLO a9-46.smtp-out.amazonses.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729013AbeIXWJU (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:09:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1537805188; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Feedback-ID; bh=4ghcc2InIqsZQIa27hdEtzuur6dVGVoGu6sUD5wpu9I=; b=FbEjlp1T0N7yX4QsWP7s1H99C7Ks5g8EzLA+jYeP5pCyPujjHcNg+RRmxzazgAx2 vGghH2Sn3eAumt/7Gy0Mfj83MFBE7Onj6IXvInob6vuJyrHCvONYeu4wDVl7/GHxw7w ecR2WXQzGMBF5kjeSw4K9DYuz1pbTPWEZnJajKMg= Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:06:28 +0000 From: Christopher Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@nuc-kabylake To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov , Ming Lei , linux-block , linux-mm , Linux FS Devel , "open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" , Dave Chinner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jens Axboe , Ming Lei Subject: Re: block: DMA alignment of IO buffer allocated from slab In-Reply-To: <20180921130504.GA22551@lst.de> Message-ID: <010001660c54fb65-b9d3a770-6678-40d0-8088-4db20af32280-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <20180920063129.GB12913@lst.de> <87h8ij0zot.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20180921130504.GA22551@lst.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SES-Outgoing: 2018.09.24-54.240.9.46 Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.fQZZZ0Xtj2+TD7V5apTT/NrT6QKuPgzCT/IC7XYgDKI=:AmazonSES Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 03:04:18PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > Christoph Hellwig writes: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:15:43PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > >> 1) does kmalloc-N slab guarantee to return N-byte aligned buffer? If > > >> yes, is it a stable rule? > > > > > > This is the assumption in a lot of the kernel, so I think if somethings > > > breaks this we are in a lot of pain. > > > > It seems that SLUB debug breaks this assumption. Kernel built with > > > > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y > > CONFIG_SLUB=y > > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y > > Looks like we should fix SLUB debug then.. Nope. We need to not make unwarranted assumptions. Alignment is guaranteed to ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN for kmalloc requests. Fantasizing about alighments and guessing from alignments that result on a particular hardware and slab configuration that these are general does not work.