Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:56:59 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 207/235] rcu: Fix grace-period hangs due to race
 with CPU offline
Message-ID: <20180924175659.GA19402@kroah.com>
References: <20180924113103.999624566@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20180924113124.637508442@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20180924164406.GE4222@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180924164406.GE4222@linux.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:44:06AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:53:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> This should not be needed in 4.18 because of a number of crude but
> effective grace-period forward-progress failsafes.  I have not tested
> it in isolation.  It looks harmless enough, but all testing has been in
> conjunction with a large number of preceding patches.
> 
> I therefore strongly recommend against backporting this one.

Now dropped from all 3 queues, thanks for letting me know.

greg k-h