Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180919221331.2511558-1-taoren@fb.com> <CACRpkdZGjvLZY7snev5W2rRGgO7bQsSqn5u2v5Nw0tH9sa4yBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <84F9ED20-0964-462E-B389-39B107A232D3@fb.com> <CACPK8XeEZeMskkxNChhNSO+brpoPJ5FqweWNXe22BpyytwCwFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <E3FA56EF-0B3C-4DBE-9A63-428EB342887D@fb.com>
In-Reply-To: <E3FA56EF-0B3C-4DBE-9A63-428EB342887D@fb.com>
From:   Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:50:11 +0930
Message-ID: <CACPK8Xd03w51FM8iJsFNhWkpRFMhy97XZpxOhbRwbD3ytQcRbg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/fttmr010: fix set_next_event handler
To:     Tao Ren <taoren@fb.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>, cov@fb.com,
        Tian Fang <tfang@fb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 03:41, Tao Ren <taoren@fb.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/20/18, 8:33 PM, "Joel Stanley" <joel@jms.id.au> wrote:
>
> > I gave this a spin on the ast2400. It looked okay, but I was wondering
> > if you could share you test case so I can run the same test?
>
> Thank you Joel for the testing.
> Sure I can share the test (a small c program which measures delay introduced by nanosleep()), but what would be the preferred way to share it? Like a format-patch? Or maybe I should refine the test and send to openbmc for review?

Whatever method is easiest for you. A patch file or a tarball is fine.
I will then add it to the set of tests I run when testing aspeed
kernels.

Cheers,

Joel