Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180912035352.11191-1-diego.viola@gmail.com> <CA+ToGPGSOsLpbOvjjb22B510qkNefdsUSiFTYON7c=oh0s8vcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANiq72m_X1U+NVf1VQuUcCi9-dERrCG3Y3tueRGbOpPd5u+a0g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72m_X1U+NVf1VQuUcCi9-dERrCG3Y3tueRGbOpPd5u+a0g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:33:41 -0300
Message-ID: <CA+ToGPHwo73ru+gf8dLPpPFmETvPpE8EwRGQCKYSrC1MedKrVw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH TRIVIAL] Punctuation fixes
To:     miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com, jikos@kernel.org
Cc:     corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Miguel,

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 9:59 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Diego,
>
> A few things, since it looks like this is your first patch.
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:54 AM Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  CREDITS     | 2 +-
> >>  MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> >>  Makefile    | 2 +-
> >>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/CREDITS b/CREDITS
> >> index 5befd2d71..b82efb36d 100644
> >> --- a/CREDITS
> >> +++ b/CREDITS
> >> @@ -1473,7 +1473,7 @@ W: http://www.linux-ide.org/
> >>  W: http://www.linuxdiskcert.org/
> >>  D: Random SMP kernel hacker...
> >>  D: Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver
> >> -D: Active-ATA-Chipset maddness..........
> >> +D: Active-ATA-Chipset maddness...
>
> I think the extra dots is what was intended here :)

OK.

>
> >>  D: Ultra DMA 133/100/66/33 w/48-bit Addressing
> >>  D: ATA-Disconnect, ATA-TCQ
> >>  D: ATA-Smart Kernel Daemon
> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >> index d870cb57c..6567bf245 100644
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Descriptions of section entries:
> >>            Supported:   Someone is actually paid to look after this.
> >>            Maintained:  Someone actually looks after it.
> >>            Odd Fixes:   It has a maintainer but they don't have time to do
> >> -                       much other than throw the odd patch in. See below..
> >> +                       much other than throw the odd patch in. See below.
> >>            Orphan:      No current maintainer [but maybe you could take the
> >>                         role as you write your new code].
> >>            Obsolete:    Old code. Something tagged obsolete generally means
> >> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> >> index 4d5c883a9..7b5c5d634 100644
> >> --- a/Makefile
> >> +++ b/Makefile
> >> @@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ archprepare: archheaders archscripts prepare1 scripts_basic
> >>  prepare0: archprepare gcc-plugins
> >>         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=.
> >>
> >> -# All the preparing..
> >> +# All the preparing...
> >>  prepare: prepare0 prepare-objtool
> >>
> >>  # Support for using generic headers in asm-generic
> >> --
> >> 2.19.0
> >>
> >
> > Jonathan,
> >
> > can you please merge my patch? After you merge this one, I'll go
> > through the rest of the documentation to make it more consistent.
>
> Jonathan is not responsible for these files. Jiri Kosina is the
> maintainer of the trivial tree.

OK, I'm CCing him with this email.

>
> There are 1700+ instances of a "two-stops ellipsis" in the kernel. I
> am not sure they were mistakes, given their prevalence, even if they are
> not formal/common English. Also, I am not sure a commit for each 3 is
> really appropriate! :) Maybe do the full sweep of the Documentation
> ones in a single patch?

Good idea, do you know what approach I can use for the full sweep? sed
perhaps? Doing this manually would be very tedious and using sed might
be error prone.

>
> Also, typically you would note in the subject that this is a "v2" of
> your previous patch (if I am not wrong, you sent a first version
> fixing only one of the 3 mistakes).

Correct, this is my V2 of the first patch. Sorry for not specifying that.

>
> Thanks for your first patch!
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel

Thanks,
Diego