Message-ID: <3FBA6808.5010904@techsource.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:42:16 -0500
From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
CC: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, Sven Dowideit <svenud@ozemail.com.au>,
       Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air
References: <fa.eto0cvm.1v20528@ifi.uio.no> <200311141624.32108.andrew@walrond.org> <20031114164640.GA1618@work.bitmover.com> <200311141734.57122.andrew@walrond.org> <20031114174303.GC32466@work.bitmover.com> <1068959565.889.5.camel@sven> <20031118153054.GB10584@work.bitmover.com> <20031118183058.GS476@phunnypharm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 944
Lines: 25


Ben Collins wrote:
>>Just to be clear, what we are talking about is a free client which talks to
>>a modified BK server.  The client has the ability to 
> 
> 
> I just wanted to be clear on what you meant by "free". Is that free as
> in binary with less restrictive license than the current bk client, or
> "free" as in includes the source under the GPL? If the latter, you can
> bet your ass I'd use it. If the former, it would allow me to use it, but
> I can't guarantee I would.
> 

I think he said something about providing source code.  GPL would be 
wise to use because, for instance, BSD license would give away too much 
to his competitors.

Maybe this will tone down some of the whining.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/