Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180925182601.37421-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180925182601.37421-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:49:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YTjjfZhH6rpOArSVub_XhC4mvbKn6Rf0DSiy=rAHQGzPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [0/5] rcu doc updates
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:26 AM Joel Fernandes (Google)
<joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
> These patches are documentation updates for the rcu_dynticks rolling into
> rcu_data and also the updates to the fact that there's a single rcu_state now.
> Its based on your rcu/dev branch.
>
> Next I'm thinking of tackling 'RCU Callback Handling' and further digging into
> the dyntick handling and then dig into other documents outside of
> Data-Structure that need updates. But let me know any suggestions.
> Thanks!

Apologies that my scripts missed the 'PATCH' prefix. Hopefully that's
Ok for this time, but let me know if you'd like me to resend them!
Thanks!

 - Joel