Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp691431imm; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 05:27:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62wcRKXExAY2NUVywprHugIIca+Rt3rRQu1kOfvH9gfILB7P5IHPIhQo5JLhD2iTt/MiFtg X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:768c:: with SMTP id m12-v6mr6023619pll.56.1537964871603; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 05:27:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1537964871; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ytNFY80+eBDPTY9131KcY8J40DEEkjumQLUSO2oznVlPtzv9uzmqc5mLkGBD6QXleu Vn9xYkANVwtv9l+BLKdRSrJoNwYpJmgvMhEofUtUw/i4Pk82ca0NwgzA+VICvehaTyAl iTpsKpixFZ1/8XyMWHABMoC9vLvwuH1OkXBgJo9BUD7PlnGT+iQsyuqlYEGR5yr4dT6b KX51Htpq5vqqZEPeZwqA47Ofy722wj7m4Tx73HCgb4x4qipBH/ZYDXjXtGjrgMDa45uX K2ldwbzZw3D7HI5OsyKkYy+eqPaJsjunA9TN/FKUf4/BCGk4vcjFj/aopt/G/m1SjQEx DHHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=SoqudVtpB0yGbyWANxZkNmc/MOp5qf6cSrI2v8Km4tc=; b=l3YJuwHswUu8INRrlq+ZPsB6XXkuGk4gEr75mCzQsNztDA+58287eU8tMhg62DFzQj jKOshtQAJgDR3aA0Q+/CHgBglK8vnoviI1XbdmLbQb4aUHLc3zcEouQtD5YmpybxTJHx mgNPGsKDCMEdfzsXXAEAv/pAqgabw2c1iH707SXdvegIdcQmbEXtJ2N4ihPdDZFTP6nv ErodAo/1ow69GaGWqy0ekvtFZNuHbk6GnM4uETftGRkGLb4KaMvOaXltKUq8M9YaiF5L tlqaIpc1WNBWJq885qv3Y/4GhNwdAfO3qKHHRNV13aQeUalBivAiP++S5ef5SDkcP2fY JHNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y3-v6si5245962pga.500.2018.09.26.05.27.36; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 05:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727292AbeIZSkO (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:40:14 -0400 Received: from belmont94srvr.owm.bell.net ([184.150.200.94]:32916 "EHLO mtlfep07.bell.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726768AbeIZSkO (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:40:14 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1083 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:40:13 EDT Received: from bell.net mtlfep02 184.150.200.30 by mtlfep02.bell.net with ESMTP id <20180926120928.MUVD11841.mtlfep02.bell.net@mtlspm02.bell.net>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:09:28 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.49] (really [70.53.62.196]) by mtlspm02.bell.net with ESMTP id <20180926120928.NLCF26679.mtlspm02.bell.net@[192.168.2.49]>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:09:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: Remove PTE load and fault check from L2_ptep macro To: Guenter Roeck Cc: jejb@parisc-linux.org, Helge Deller , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180926032101.GA2458@roeck-us.net> From: John David Anglin Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:09:26 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180926032101.GA2458@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=L+Xye6b8 c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=Zvhif4XNTjWcJyJCfFIh1A==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=JBFolyDoGHsA:10 a=FBHGMhGWAAAA:8 a=WIMuH9iB4f1ny0LeIgcA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=9gvnlMMaQFpL9xblJ6ne:22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 2018-09-25 11:21 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > This patch causes my parisc qemu tests to fail. > Unfortunately I don't have any useful log output; the failure > is silent. Reverting the patch fixes the problem. Can you be more specific on how to run these tests? Dave -- John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net