Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes
From:   lijiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc:     dan.j.williams@intel.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, bhe@redhat.com,
        thomas.lendacky@amd.com, tiwai@suse.de, x86@kernel.org,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de, dyoung@redhat.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
References: <20180921073211.20097-2-lijiang@redhat.com>
 <153782698067.130337.12079523922130875402.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
 <1894f2ba-42ab-c044-ea0c-63eab98d9815@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4295243b-20b4-9d21-5863-bab102a6a6d9@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:36:48 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1894f2ba-42ab-c044-ea0c-63eab98d9815@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

在 2018年09月26日 17:22, lijiang 写道:
> 
> 
> 在 2018年09月25日 06:14, Bjorn Helgaas 写道:
>> Hi Lianbo,
>>
>> These three patches are a possible replacement for your first patch
>> ("[PATCH 1/3 v3] resource: fix an error which walks through iomem
>> resources").
>>
>> I think the interface of find_next_iomem_res() can be improved to make
>> the code easier to read and also avoid the errors you're fixing.
>>
>> I can't test these, so they've only been compiled.  If you can test
>> them and if you like them, feel free to incorporate them into your
>> series.  If not, just drop them (but please at least fix the same
>> error in walk_system_ram_range()).
>>
> Hi, Bjorn
> Sorry for my late reply about this. No need to incorporate them into
> my patch series, you might freely submit them to upstream.
> 
> I will test your patches whether it can also work well for my case, and
> you will get feedback about my test later.
> 
For my case, your patches can also work well.

> Thanks.
> Lianbo
> 
>> ---
>>
>> Bjorn Helgaas (3):
>>       x86/kexec: Correct KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END off-by-one error
>>       resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces
>>       resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue
>>
>>
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h |    2 -
>>  kernel/resource.c            |   96 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kexec mailing list
>> kexec@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>>