Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp864278imm; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:59:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61eJwBPdIOXeDIPz58NuLpNk7wWfby4gozm3aV4GHhpF7AYh8DJI03M7ASZMBqrdrpbeCEA X-Received: by 2002:a63:64c2:: with SMTP id y185-v6mr6135630pgb.411.1537973944851; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:59:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1537973944; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QSituk9GIroFqZl5VRlciYW7hRL8ngvwOixJhrMCSzjK89SFyLvIFJD+gJ1Wh8bqrm 4Wtflp+H+6tbKUx1aCiiwfcV/xyiWSzwO7zmFP0Dt3lu4u8fO25Y/AMTRnIgQZZdyd8Y Fu/gljAf4MZ2PVItO5vUxHLZXX1Z4G2Cg2UTf4VXXZCr68yNihKvbggHntnoWptgCXn5 PBKmOahRXoknagcIF83vKDvUUtOKo6B3u0L/K7Ov7TXNjp6YDTT148kF/ZOn2Ch0Tyef OiXuMUC/TvG8XRqPYTcbURkGdABWnOUQsLYGbvfJHbdwuR4iO1BRePVJENwtg4E6DoSg Myqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:subject:from; bh=v+d5A0LXGgvoawepsYYT4OGTwyA6tCdU8l7JBgXnLqA=; b=iPwMNi5fJrv0XyrGgKVCPNnwRvcYbPzSjXtdZdlwh5EsFY0xfWswdzePG6gXE6TZMI d0JoMyZ2YeiwynkWTV6zNN92kvrkN7JvoHT50tJHlo/2su2YLW5/qOQ5KDrF3RE14H2Z t6pyZM5aL2yEi537JvLgrGjDByZRNPe6QM3fSTU1xRrHd8vrQ9+7nxJpiqlBFkLraDYj zsH05st+c+wrOgePBccEaS/Zu6PevZxeI53ffmOV03Hjt06iYv7IMW1imlJWexFIRakP mSoSi3cSLSf4X2AcQtN8ss6jp7P/45KrQuvB8ZaVDDxF+leBJFXYJY3zhm42KIPVr9eB ANVw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i33-v6si5658376pld.306.2018.09.26.07.58.49; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728266AbeIZVKO (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:10:14 -0400 Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.131]:15146 "EHLO mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727159AbeIZVKN (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:10:13 -0400 X-RZG-AUTH: ":LX8JdEmkW/4tAFwMkcNJIloh1hrA5u3owhPk7bdT5Fx2zAOrX/r2ZbrrxoyOl37jyAS87PCEdNZ1JosR9A8+EnwdTNhIEa3LxU1dwv15qr4=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from [IPv6:2001:16b8:24d1:c900:7e56:f2b:35d9:ddc0] by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.2 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id y02093u8QEii0zq (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:44:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Frieder Schrempf Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: Add mmc_force_detect_change_begin / _end functions To: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, baolin.wang@linaro.org, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, icenowy@aosc.xyz, wens@csie.org References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:44:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:01:00PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > [...] > > >> > I'd like to know if any progress has been made on that problem (I may > >> > have missed patches). > >> > Had you had the time to look at the issue? > >> > >> I have looked at the issue, but not manage to cook some patches for it. > >> > >> However, it's on my top of my TODO list for mmc. No promises, but > >> perhaps and hopefully I manage to get something posted during the > >> coming release cycle. I would be interested in a ESP8089 driver in mainline and that's why I want to pick up this discussion. What is the current status of the "mmc_reprobe_device" implementation, that Hans was explaining and Ulf wanted to provide some months ago? BTW, I am not on any of the mailing lists involved, so I tried to recreate the proper mail headers manually for the reply to the correct thread. Thanks, Frieder > >> > > > > Cool! If you ever need some testing, I'd be glad to test your patches > > (even if they are in a draft/RFC state). > > > > Also, when you send patches, I'd appreciate being Cc'ed so that I can > > put my Tested-by :) Thanks! > > Absolutely! I appreciate it.