Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To:     kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com>,
        Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@redhat.com>,
        Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 4/7] KVM: x86: hyperv: keep track of mismatched VP indexes
Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:02:56 +0200
Message-Id: <20180926170259.29796-5-vkuznets@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180926170259.29796-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
References: <20180926170259.29796-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

In most common cases VP index of a vcpu matches its vcpu index. Userspace
is, however, free to set any mapping it wishes and we need to account for
that when we need to find a vCPU with a particular VP index. To keep search
algorithms optimal in both cases introduce 'num_mismatched_vp_indexes'
counter showing how many vCPUs with mismatching VP index we have. In case
the counter is zero we can assume vp_index == vcpu_idx.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c           | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 09b2e3e2cf1b..711f79f1b5e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -781,6 +781,9 @@ struct kvm_hv {
 	u64 hv_reenlightenment_control;
 	u64 hv_tsc_emulation_control;
 	u64 hv_tsc_emulation_status;
+
+	/* How many vCPUs have VP index != vCPU index */
+	atomic_t num_mismatched_vp_indexes;
 };
 
 enum kvm_irqchip_mode {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index c8764faf783b..6a19c8e3c432 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -1045,11 +1045,31 @@ static int kvm_hv_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data, bool host)
 	struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu = &vcpu->arch.hyperv;
 
 	switch (msr) {
-	case HV_X64_MSR_VP_INDEX:
-		if (!host || (u32)data >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
+	case HV_X64_MSR_VP_INDEX: {
+		struct kvm_hv *hv = &vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv;
+		int vcpu_idx = kvm_vcpu_get_idx(vcpu);
+		u32 new_vp_index = (u32)data;
+
+		if (!host || new_vp_index >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
 			return 1;
-		hv_vcpu->vp_index = (u32)data;
+
+		if (new_vp_index == hv_vcpu->vp_index)
+			return 0;
+
+		/*
+		 * VP index is changing, increment num_mismatched_vp_indexes in
+		 * case it was equal to vcpu_idx before; on the other hand, if
+		 * the new VP index matches vcpu_idx num_mismatched_vp_indexes
+		 * needs to be decremented.
+		 */
+		if (hv_vcpu->vp_index == vcpu_idx)
+			atomic_inc(&hv->num_mismatched_vp_indexes);
+		else if (new_vp_index == vcpu_idx)
+			atomic_dec(&hv->num_mismatched_vp_indexes);
+
+		hv_vcpu->vp_index = new_vp_index;
 		break;
+	}
 	case HV_X64_MSR_VP_ASSIST_PAGE: {
 		u64 gfn;
 		unsigned long addr;
-- 
2.17.1