Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1591936imm; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:28:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63gudcuQRzMi3QwFzcSXFucn51xMUlsIkF/qYHNyo2Ulk3lF8J5xM8SwYjFzzoAzy41ak8Q X-Received: by 2002:a63:6203:: with SMTP id w3-v6mr8476211pgb.53.1538026105303; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:28:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538026105; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZszIE5CbmdizEC6pvEBuqIMARamn1L6ZtRU14YbF2iu11bggQIZYZPVUk//+3h9CXE pVBaJJhchrwA3Yhsf7ULL//vRGuU+OwEJ+jGeUAgBuUBEY3d8N8b+UyTN9fQFyXB1frI 8FXm1aSm8c0wohboYQNt7bendYuUWNMI+SBK1mzOiD78H/ZVL4WprOmos7FI4sGgRGD/ c0e4O6+sGMDXhJMSWtfXhY7de36Q/IbszFdz98rnZkxy9igR4HeGDZjr3rxI6Ch9AaJf KExXnNJbGSeG1E+CfhPBDKns9exMC/h0tiSledqBcK1J2doPaMvwSdV07uYZGohk5Mng XbDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=VqEXV9mXdJqUrYlIAYQbTAayH3VT7K5n5zq3kI78MME=; b=gKM8fYF8U/uedtNyqIGn2QaY+7KUI32PTx4bx69vnNz8tvqjJHqP5cc0+VEKcvtZld RKft7ZkK05ikWEpL9tBzB7LGIO0jXwGNk1JnokKlHnDCMu+z0TFd9FSj2RpeAJOKgUlU yQmtMX6HYQDIKeMyqZnvM7eOg9nk/Ftfgi8skqAiwE8shh7xm3zt5c5MLJJqjDaHd9Dv ylBmjuI1CrOKoTl26NbmNJxjd2DUnE7dbqaUpeioYpJluknsbypa0FtjWZQ19qmFPIx6 90HxaP8JzIvi7XH6B38mc5MsflqVGgWC4IHT3nwD2zT61AiQ62V06vCN2iq6Wc2+eQYp Vwhw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l6-v6si1013459pgl.602.2018.09.26.22.28.10; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726947AbeI0Lo1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:44:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41418 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726599AbeI0Lo0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:44:26 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF36E3082B64; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 05:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-12-101.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.101]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B607100195E; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 05:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, bhe@redhat.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, tiwai@suse.de, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de, dyoung@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Vivek Goyal References: <153782698067.130337.12079523922130875402.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <153782730364.130337.17794279728329113665.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> From: lijiang Message-ID: <13084ce6-e29a-c244-3f9c-cf0725646d9f@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:27:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <153782730364.130337.17794279728329113665.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.45]); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 05:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2018年09月25日 06:15, Bjorn Helgaas 写道: > From: Bjorn Helgaas > > Previously find_next_iomem_res() used "*res" as both an input parameter for > the range to search and the type of resource to search for, and an output > parameter for the resource we found, which makes the interface confusing > and hard to use correctly. > > All callers allocate a single struct resource and use it for repeated calls > to find_next_iomem_res(). When find_next_iomem_res() returns a resource, > it overwrites the start, end, flags, and desc members of the struct. If we > call find_next_iomem_res() again, we must update or restore these fields. > > The callers (__walk_iomem_res_desc() and walk_system_ram_range()) do not > restore res->flags, so if the caller is searching for flags of > IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY and finds a resource with flags of > IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_SYSRAM, the next search will > find only resources marked as IORESOURCE_SYSRAM. > > Fix this by restructuring the interface so it takes explicit "start, end, > flags" parameters and uses "*res" only as an output parameter. > Hi, Bjorn I personally suggest that some comments might be added in the code, make it clear and easy to understand, then which could avoid the old confusion and more code changes. Thanks Lianbo > Original-patch: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180921073211.20097-2-lijiang@redhat.com > Based-on-patch-by: Lianbo Jiang > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas > --- > kernel/resource.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c > index 155ec873ea4d..9891ea90cc8f 100644 > --- a/kernel/resource.c > +++ b/kernel/resource.c > @@ -319,23 +319,26 @@ int release_resource(struct resource *old) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource); > > /* > - * Finds the lowest iomem resource existing within [res->start..res->end]. > - * The caller must specify res->start, res->end, res->flags, and optionally > - * desc. If found, returns 0, res is overwritten, if not found, returns -1. > - * This function walks the whole tree and not just first level children until > - * and unless first_level_children_only is true. > + * Finds the lowest iomem resource that covers part of [start..end]. The > + * caller must specify start, end, flags, and desc (which may be > + * IORES_DESC_NONE). > + * > + * If a resource is found, returns 0 and *res is overwritten with the part > + * of the resource that's within [start..end]; if none is found, returns > + * -1. > + * > + * This function walks the whole tree and not just first level children > + * unless first_level_children_only is true. > */ > -static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc, > - bool first_level_children_only) > +static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, > + unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc, > + bool first_level_children_only, > + struct resource *res) > { > - resource_size_t start, end; > struct resource *p; > bool sibling_only = false; > > BUG_ON(!res); > - > - start = res->start; > - end = res->end; > BUG_ON(start >= end); > > if (first_level_children_only) > @@ -344,7 +347,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc, > read_lock(&resource_lock); > > for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p, sibling_only)) { > - if ((p->flags & res->flags) != res->flags) > + if ((p->flags & flags) != flags) > continue; > if ((desc != IORES_DESC_NONE) && (desc != p->desc)) > continue; > @@ -359,32 +362,31 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc, > read_unlock(&resource_lock); > if (!p) > return -1; > + > /* copy data */ > - if (res->start < p->start) > - res->start = p->start; > - if (res->end > p->end) > - res->end = p->end; > + res->start = max(start, p->start); > + res->end = min(end, p->end); > res->flags = p->flags; > res->desc = p->desc; > return 0; > } > > -static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc, > - bool first_level_children_only, > - void *arg, > +static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, > + unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc, > + bool first_level_children_only, void *arg, > int (*func)(struct resource *, void *)) > { > - u64 orig_end = res->end; > + struct resource res; > int ret = -1; > > - while ((res->start < res->end) && > - !find_next_iomem_res(res, desc, first_level_children_only)) { > - ret = (*func)(res, arg); > + while (start < end && > + !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, > + first_level_children_only, &res)) { > + ret = (*func)(&res, arg); > if (ret) > break; > > - res->start = res->end + 1; > - res->end = orig_end; > + start = res.end + 1; > } > > return ret; > @@ -407,13 +409,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc, > int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start, > u64 end, void *arg, int (*func)(struct resource *, void *)) > { > - struct resource res; > - > - res.start = start; > - res.end = end; > - res.flags = flags; > - > - return __walk_iomem_res_desc(&res, desc, false, arg, func); > + return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, false, arg, func); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_iomem_res_desc); > > @@ -427,13 +423,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_iomem_res_desc); > int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg, > int (*func)(struct resource *, void *)) > { > - struct resource res; > - > - res.start = start; > - res.end = end; > - res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY; > + unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY; > > - return __walk_iomem_res_desc(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, true, > + return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, true, > arg, func); > } > > @@ -444,13 +436,9 @@ int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg, > int walk_mem_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg, > int (*func)(struct resource *, void *)) > { > - struct resource res; > - > - res.start = start; > - res.end = end; > - res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY; > + unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY; > > - return __walk_iomem_res_desc(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, true, > + return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, true, > arg, func); > } > > @@ -464,25 +452,25 @@ int walk_mem_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg, > int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, > void *arg, int (*func)(unsigned long, unsigned long, void *)) > { > + resource_size_t start, end; > + unsigned long flags; > struct resource res; > unsigned long pfn, end_pfn; > - u64 orig_end; > int ret = -1; > > - res.start = (u64) start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; > - res.end = ((u64)(start_pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1; > - res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY; > - orig_end = res.end; > - while ((res.start < res.end) && > - (find_next_iomem_res(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, true) >= 0)) { > + start = (u64) start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; > + end = ((u64)(start_pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1; > + flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY; > + while (start < end && > + !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, > + true, &res)) { > pfn = (res.start + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > end_pfn = (res.end + 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > if (end_pfn > pfn) > ret = (*func)(pfn, end_pfn - pfn, arg); > if (ret) > break; > - res.start = res.end + 1; > - res.end = orig_end; > + start = res.end + 1; > } > return ret; > } > > > _______________________________________________ > kexec mailing list > kexec@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec >