Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp2151848imm; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 08:12:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61k0qGRM9zeWEA9w4QgWDn1d/s3Yfsn0eDwhhrkuyQ1ke1bBnL12pf9AYczbfRzY0+Qun7c X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:59dd:: with SMTP id d29-v6mr11679170plj.34.1538061153556; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 08:12:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538061153; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZcYtw17y4lJBulUciwcqkRvGMqegXKEqgF6MbkhbkdvTlJcrqgxxeJPbGi2fGf/l8b sec3D5sIKVfg1ild6nImVb+xlwzAQ1NtiwnFf1MBOO+/JDmx5BtTdiuBXFdxUNUL/Uii 3BoerX1G1EfN64gtQEeA0OecZ5YlS0J2+axaSumfSIVcFegD0rYzpmcdUg5iQyC7O9hz m20ZLg8E3jwkro2C2qEqe8ir5KHKW1MjhCwO96G8Vv/uYR6hYwhTQnV3/zEmX/56/C2f ZegIEfQdOgfLELHJoBGiI195H0Ajx5lxFrZ1EKZpfCUC+TMcH0eRlt/hk2hbUsWTOQuB /gkQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=MDvXFHbBVPCiaxPFAEYKrLG36j1/sMJfgiFFw3qx+M4=; b=fry4j87MeGNJMOxezA+QOAAJURZKSLH6NDMow/lZ5b+y6VPXugJc87Q/IcznhiUhGA tMjFMPRlkLUwX+ac40BkEbN0V468AkWDjxiu84T2GCIVsl6O2zjFNmliAtX19VI/+Er0 jWzHdkRIlDwJyhAAu2n9vmZEu5378C31mkndLuYX7HkSyDZVWctstNxzJcllJ6gpCoNk ufOkspLJe9oALIFm53GI2qHI7vl2kuHFHny68k1Tg/QFR0qxfEPXWkhihja9lKWRD03P EWSFC1NT1XIcKPjw5n4zBm9ApcRTI+/KyUaBqdaUIOMuTyZYnM7Vv7Z/nK5PXQ+G4uPC TURg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tycho-ws.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=zc2Zb8zY; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a190-v6si2546717pfb.144.2018.09.27.08.12.05; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 08:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tycho-ws.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=zc2Zb8zY; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728335AbeI0Vac (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:30:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:37108 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728314AbeI0Vab (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:30:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id c10-v6so2193678pgq.4 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 08:11:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tycho-ws.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=MDvXFHbBVPCiaxPFAEYKrLG36j1/sMJfgiFFw3qx+M4=; b=zc2Zb8zY/53XgpSjwTSMxedGAC5xVOqjcalnX29zw8pUq0UDiXkiDyE8CHVQaWSTjP lYSt2QWGIMlt7VN3RYzTYAumpuMlYfkbzUa4HNnzNlgcw92NSoXQhrIghTO7BIh5XnT7 q6Dd5vr+Icwi7r4C4BsL7duXgglSMcu/HiyZkK2IwHMyUMRS72T8EfjAFdd/wljahvU2 BZu/KSZheJn5fsdlfDSeSezou8PbHgfeMCnGeCRhZGwn6Yvqqa7mvrKUKUf586C1Omar 4aH2F4h3LTcbJYBpA3rhvCmgVbzps1sn13x7jsOQpP+4exPRd9boJeWrbKN4Rdh2dyog haeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=MDvXFHbBVPCiaxPFAEYKrLG36j1/sMJfgiFFw3qx+M4=; b=Rts9PaazoRbA3pPY6RJDQSkWZhhSndPYT23QxPtbi59A+qJ/s19smpSXnuPU05pP3V M6TP0IWim1zDjQSTeaYvyU5hK1xeTHXF2HyzsfFeIRKkFfRJxySH1VyNbn1+ObZfvUI6 ur+rSAMnuz73aM7JEhspNXGdGNqKnebJrLmEpB5gA9HCH/kc+PUm01bvzIFtyneUhd7k XF06ai/KoYK7QPfq0Y94R24n/9sKO9G60OTkZc8kr8g7Nc9ejdcQxqRdig/S5yxKYhtX CUztLPgBs1NefJWDMs7uGF6nGFsTEnLJaqkVoP852xyAJmcgllMnDPbVdAhheL07z43W Dvng== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiEkT/dhTjj3avrXwz+7Mr+aW50P8sWYDOJ9XCWSLw/EfsP743m PQXY0QqQSeauiOQIQ878Am6Vlg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:599d:: with SMTP id p29-v6mr11636456pli.74.1538061108239; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 08:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([128.107.241.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y19-v6sm5429610pff.14.2018.09.27.08.11.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 08:11:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Tycho Andersen To: Kees Cook Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W . Biederman" , "Serge E . Hallyn" , Christian Brauner , Tyler Hicks , Akihiro Suda , Jann Horn , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Tycho Andersen Subject: [PATCH v7 6/6] samples: add an example of seccomp user trap Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:11:19 -0600 Message-Id: <20180927151119.9989-7-tycho@tycho.ws> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20180927151119.9989-1-tycho@tycho.ws> References: <20180927151119.9989-1-tycho@tycho.ws> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The idea here is just to give a demonstration of how one could safely use the SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF feature to do mount policies. This particular policy is (as noted in the comment) not very interesting, but it serves to illustrate how one might apply a policy dodging the various TOCTOU issues. v5: new in v5 v7: updates for v7 API changes Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen CC: Kees Cook CC: Andy Lutomirski CC: Oleg Nesterov CC: Eric W. Biederman CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" CC: Christian Brauner CC: Tyler Hicks CC: Akihiro Suda --- samples/seccomp/.gitignore | 1 + samples/seccomp/Makefile | 7 +- samples/seccomp/user-trap.c | 312 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/samples/seccomp/.gitignore b/samples/seccomp/.gitignore index 78fb78184291..d1e2e817d556 100644 --- a/samples/seccomp/.gitignore +++ b/samples/seccomp/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ bpf-direct bpf-fancy dropper +user-trap diff --git a/samples/seccomp/Makefile b/samples/seccomp/Makefile index cf34ff6b4065..4920903c8009 100644 --- a/samples/seccomp/Makefile +++ b/samples/seccomp/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 ifndef CROSS_COMPILE -hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_SECCOMP) := bpf-fancy dropper bpf-direct +hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_SECCOMP) := bpf-fancy dropper bpf-direct user-trap HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include bpf-direct-objs := bpf-direct.o +HOSTCFLAGS_user-trap.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include +HOSTCFLAGS_user-trap.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include +user-trap-objs := user-trap.o + # Try to match the kernel target. ifndef CONFIG_64BIT @@ -33,6 +37,7 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += $(MFLAG) HOSTLDLIBS_bpf-direct += $(MFLAG) HOSTLDLIBS_bpf-fancy += $(MFLAG) HOSTLDLIBS_dropper += $(MFLAG) +HOSTLDLIBS_user-trap += $(MFLAG) endif always := $(hostprogs-m) endif diff --git a/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..63c9a5994dc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c @@ -0,0 +1,312 @@ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* + * Because of some grossness, we can't include linux/ptrace.h here, so we + * re-define PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER. + */ +#ifndef PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER +#define PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER 0x420e +#endif + +#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof(*(x))) + +static int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args) +{ + errno = 0; + return syscall(__NR_seccomp, op, flags, args); +} + +static int user_trap_syscall(int nr, unsigned int flags) +{ + struct sock_filter filter[] = { + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, + offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)), + BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, nr, 0, 1), + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF), + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), + }; + + struct sock_fprog prog = { + .len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter), + .filter = filter, + }; + + return seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flags, &prog); +} + +static int handle_req(struct seccomp_notif *req, + struct seccomp_notif_resp *resp, int listener) +{ + char path[PATH_MAX], source[PATH_MAX], target[PATH_MAX]; + int ret = -1, mem; + + resp->len = sizeof(*resp); + resp->id = req->id; + resp->error = -EPERM; + resp->val = 0; + + if (req->data.nr != __NR_mount) { + fprintf(stderr, "huh? trapped something besides mknod? %d\n", req->data.nr); + return -1; + } + + /* Only allow bind mounts. */ + if (!(req->data.args[3] & MS_BIND)) + return 0; + + /* + * Ok, let's read the task's memory to see where they wanted their + * mount to go. + */ + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/proc/%d/mem", req->pid); + mem = open(path, O_RDONLY); + if (mem < 0) { + perror("open mem"); + return -1; + } + + /* + * Now we avoid a TOCTOU: we referred to a pid by its pid, but since + * the pid that made the syscall may have died, we need to confirm that + * the pid is still valid after we open its /proc/pid/mem file. We can + * ask the listener fd this as follows. + * + * Note that this check should occur *after* any task-specific + * resources are opened, to make sure that the task has not died and + * we're not wrongly reading someone else's state in order to make + * decisions. + */ + if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_NOTIF_ID_VALID, &req->id) < 0) { + fprintf(stderr, "task died before we could map its memory\n"); + goto out; + } + + /* + * Phew, we've got the right /proc/pid/mem. Now we can read it. Note + * that to avoid another TOCTOU, we should read all of the pointer args + * before we decide to allow the syscall. + */ + if (lseek(mem, req->data.args[0], SEEK_SET) < 0) { + perror("seek"); + goto out; + } + + ret = read(mem, source, sizeof(source)); + if (ret < 0) { + perror("read"); + goto out; + } + + if (lseek(mem, req->data.args[1], SEEK_SET) < 0) { + perror("seek"); + goto out; + } + + ret = read(mem, target, sizeof(target)); + if (ret < 0) { + perror("read"); + goto out; + } + + /* + * Our policy is to only allow bind mounts inside /tmp. This isn't very + * interesting, because we could do unprivlieged bind mounts with user + * namespaces already, but you get the idea. + */ + if (!strncmp(source, "/tmp", 4) && !strncmp(target, "/tmp", 4)) { + if (mount(source, target, NULL, req->data.args[3], NULL) < 0) { + ret = -1; + perror("actual mount"); + goto out; + } + resp->error = 0; + } + + /* Even if we didn't allow it because of policy, generating the + * response was be a success, because we want to tell the worker EPERM. + */ + ret = 0; + +out: + close(mem); + return ret; +} + +int main(void) +{ + int sk_pair[2], ret = 1, status, listener; + pid_t worker = 0 , tracer = 0; + char c; + + if (socketpair(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0, sk_pair) < 0) { + perror("socketpair"); + return 1; + } + + worker = fork(); + if (worker < 0) { + perror("fork"); + goto close_pair; + } + + if (worker == 0) { + if (user_trap_syscall(__NR_mount, 0) < 0) { + perror("seccomp"); + exit(1); + } + + if (setuid(1000) < 0) { + perror("setuid"); + exit(1); + } + + if (write(sk_pair[1], "a", 1) != 1) { + perror("write"); + exit(1); + } + + if (read(sk_pair[1], &c, 1) != 1) { + perror("write"); + exit(1); + } + + if (mkdir("/tmp/foo", 0755) < 0) { + perror("mkdir"); + exit(1); + } + + if (mount("/dev/sda", "/tmp/foo", NULL, 0, NULL) != -1) { + fprintf(stderr, "huh? mounted /dev/sda?\n"); + exit(1); + } + + if (errno != EPERM) { + perror("bad error from mount"); + exit(1); + } + + if (mount("/tmp/foo", "/tmp/foo", NULL, MS_BIND, NULL) < 0) { + perror("mount"); + exit(1); + } + + exit(0); + } + + if (read(sk_pair[0], &c, 1) != 1) { + perror("read ready signal"); + goto out_kill; + } + + if (ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, worker) < 0) { + perror("ptrace"); + goto out_kill; + } + + if (waitpid(worker, NULL, 0) != worker) { + perror("waitpid"); + goto out_kill; + } + + listener = ptrace(PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER, worker, 0); + if (listener < 0) { + perror("ptrace get listener"); + goto out_kill; + } + + if (ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, worker, NULL, 0) < 0) { + perror("ptrace detach"); + goto out_kill; + } + + if (write(sk_pair[0], "a", 1) != 1) { + perror("write"); + exit(1); + } + + tracer = fork(); + if (tracer < 0) { + perror("fork"); + goto out_kill; + } + + if (tracer == 0) { + while (1) { + struct seccomp_notif req = {}; + struct seccomp_notif_resp resp = {}; + + req.len = sizeof(req); + if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_NOTIF_RECV, &req) != sizeof(req)) { + perror("ioctl recv"); + goto out_close; + } + + if (handle_req(&req, &resp, listener) < 0) + goto out_close; + + if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_NOTIF_SEND, &resp) != sizeof(resp)) { + perror("ioctl send"); + goto out_close; + } + } +out_close: + close(listener); + exit(1); + } + + close(listener); + + if (waitpid(worker, &status, 0) != worker) { + perror("waitpid"); + goto out_kill; + } + + if (umount2("/tmp/foo", MNT_DETACH) < 0 && errno != EINVAL) { + perror("umount2"); + goto out_kill; + } + + if (remove("/tmp/foo") < 0 && errno != ENOENT) { + perror("remove"); + exit(1); + } + + if (!WIFEXITED(status) || WEXITSTATUS(status)) { + fprintf(stderr, "worker exited nonzero\n"); + goto out_kill; + } + + ret = 0; + +out_kill: + if (tracer > 0) + kill(tracer, SIGKILL); + if (worker > 0) + kill(worker, SIGKILL); + +close_pair: + close(sk_pair[0]); + close(sk_pair[1]); + return ret; +} -- 2.17.1