Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp2420908imm; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:34:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62PTwmXwQTD5oMZOzEQ1IwRgkm2u4MbUEwOuN66CSoWA2XpWGGplez7ttTytX10wdlsLoBS X-Received: by 2002:a62:9992:: with SMTP id t18-v6mr12886861pfk.239.1538076855516; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:34:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538076855; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ushd6OKtYkoAwgqYDAGeu6DHvz6wFZwmhp4ScJBDGZoT70wfY03pAXsrSfn0efk+2O GOk9I9FNpx68AwHzYOevp83XeLGSOrZI/3Jg82EPshtKdgUTXtI88uky8P/2B3gbIXDx 8wwAfa7LzuhRH5Pk7CUOKO4tdls/paHekMLoJegmJQgiyjz9xXHG0YNnQaKxe/Pxr0da d0fGEUF2v8VPYmHExDOs4HYrS+Q/VOFSzzpk4YZqvXrTiSP9Yognp2XCM1kmJlzileoc sWchMmUzUK2dKZmXr4JSmtznaOCIZso30iQ2GGrDrSSN1NBQOTbn3ledRzJXmtrAMDg6 X/Og== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=o2sgweQJ/x6bY7P9sQnh4MFq2RPLYw7dB7CY/CDntG8=; b=CqvvQ+mUFfAk3xwzxm37UKI1j6RAsa5JbqEOMnZG2vwBN9l9QlXBmkEcj69e8bmeg+ 6gskE/3fwmmYYCvYrY5NpJoQ4ablfWSHgKPkzoHWH85JYjzc4Y/2/ADOAp7cVNFSxw0+ efca0xuStALHznaaBr6UvIxK+dAjWkrkBaIUPCNNR2gtIwuSZxQoPl1x9lQm6tHXSywR 0fztxaKceIWWhZoihccUJkTK6hUWG5Sycnm0stYj7/DM3OSQHfnVus9ZIOrKp8vbJm40 X/ME4MeweKQCIOe2KPgQstzzWy4jJeU1gWhFM+jwQTc1hvswJcn4aJQUE2g+daJNNZjd ECNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iki.fi Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k8-v6si2598051plt.176.2018.09.27.12.33.58; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iki.fi Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728711AbeI1Bwr (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 21:52:47 -0400 Received: from nblzone-211-213.nblnetworks.fi ([83.145.211.213]:59492 "EHLO hillosipuli.retiisi.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728582AbeI1Bwr (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 21:52:47 -0400 Received: from valkosipuli.localdomain (valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk [IPv6:2001:1bc8:1a6:d3d5::80:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hillosipuli.retiisi.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA20B634C7E; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 22:32:56 +0300 (EEST) Received: from sakke by valkosipuli.localdomain with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g5c1w-0000Eq-Fr; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 22:32:56 +0300 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 22:32:56 +0300 From: Sakari Ailus To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Cc: Pavel Machek , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] [media] ad5820: Add support for acpi autoload Message-ID: <20180927193256.z3n5eaqroomrv62i@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> References: <20180920204751.29117-1-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> <20180920204751.29117-5-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180920204751.29117-5-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ricardo, On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Allow module autoloading of ad5820 ACPI devices. > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado > --- > drivers/media/i2c/ad5820.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ad5820.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ad5820.c > index e461d36201a4..5d1185e7f78d 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ad5820.c > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ad5820.c > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > * General Public License for more details. > */ > > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -380,6 +381,15 @@ static const struct of_device_id ad5820_of_table[] = { > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ad5820_of_table); > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > +static const struct acpi_device_id ad5820_acpi_ids[] = { > + { "AD5820" }, This is not a valid ACPI _HID. Is there a need to add ACPI support for the chip this way? > + { } > +}; > + > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, ad5820_acpi_ids); > +#endif > + > static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ad5820_pm, ad5820_suspend, ad5820_resume); > > static struct i2c_driver ad5820_i2c_driver = { > @@ -387,6 +397,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver ad5820_i2c_driver = { > .name = AD5820_NAME, > .pm = &ad5820_pm, > .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ad5820_of_table), > + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ad5820_acpi_ids), > }, > .probe = ad5820_probe, > .remove = ad5820_remove, -- Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi