Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp23183imm; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:14:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60Oplx7xSa9APUcywADlydG3xqKO6EYAetifV5bXCVTQR538pPQo+zgqLUsvhs55TAlkq49 X-Received: by 2002:a63:f:: with SMTP id 15-v6mr12325029pga.430.1538086446368; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:14:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538086446; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i7n5/Nu1VbjGbJR7lA/cqw6RQYbuO2XBEG5Phk1/3fXRKWWg3SjsjTrWipNrnN05HY 3uzc/PhpS1MvjKOmAnSh5j/S7sNDT7/pcTLJrBF4BVX9uIPu2XEG66+79MaiCC3xE0oH fdw2vo8nEgCKqAWrQZMk+46+PWBZ1NGZSS1M30Tir/+Pcsp7BX9crod8tlLxH22UIkim z46RE2TzKJ7OGJqr+X49ChPE3jPTPRRHEzsKxanAHiPVCO+R8wRhh0jvZk78UErr2R87 OPWrq1o9D2/2FMR0XPyDjir1o26SYsogFc+UIZx0Afo0uFEpCuqrWKJWODcOom9KxUJl Z7RQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Est+QkEFve4zrOJwco5qdie7uvfHUjsH10A0Aki51QA=; b=ko3/3fiGixp0rBxvjFOGOcGqBgEoKpMxInuk+F7WMS/B6En2y6Z6kUgX8amhvTV/Dk s7AqwtFUaDj7INj+QY7cAsZ32Ro68HpcCqjdqcPmBwKJr8HhyIFtW4ehQEt8mzJRLWZd +AkEvpc0p9F/TJAolr2R1rF6GLqMfV/+RKestJqfTCUhdO977WHf+hqLv9K+iegLREUA E9nnoQCgQzt+qzx1cLDuX7yYeohaqBZlVRzSVnCFyKJANHjGZesmTtJw/yn7DeVZy/wl 7UIGTsdjThUcWoM95/KKu+BXN0VCGFNhY/tT+A99fAbOK2ddyA74EnJU/jWxVDqBLH5L 1xjw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=I9kOCIYs; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v19-v6si3029033pgh.36.2018.09.27.15.13.48; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=I9kOCIYs; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727059AbeI1EcA (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:32:00 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f195.google.com ([209.85.219.195]:39981 "EHLO mail-yb1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726362AbeI1Eb7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:31:59 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f195.google.com with SMTP id w7-v6so1807328ybm.7 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:11:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Est+QkEFve4zrOJwco5qdie7uvfHUjsH10A0Aki51QA=; b=I9kOCIYsnWZSQ+VJoPFQ3c/GpAzV6zjwWS+U9mN5uIFS1QYADIC+kbbnpENFqhkxis 0ux9HrZ5WSX7POT/SoTS2RgkpCzkjNQvpto1dMusRqqZ9MzPCupQYgludhqUY8nvq0jO oZnJ/8cp9Rrfu0xHHvCBOhtxQL1WYsGwaMQgs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Est+QkEFve4zrOJwco5qdie7uvfHUjsH10A0Aki51QA=; b=MqdTSpW0UK+G5i0HB10NqCKaKuejHpHr0AaC63NC7wqS1WtfqRbPGPvuKlbD8SK+8u Dy+WKDpjIddxNMXBvSmG66a42wlYelRew3gDVA+b0hrXIb3xatOuHagQ9DFRRFW4EjhW uFUbycEpVtPDkmRHtwYacKJNP7DsJ9yV6ezdbpt61w+qMCJfn38phSjRqlLrI+Y3oEFg PbO0i3x16f530XZBiY0Wh3pj0/m8e4vrGe/cxv+Md7mgZlJz5Z50syyymyooJAHSzMy4 5SbmBO8+fSZF8LWZw4LKF8AjgS/UTlOoxrNHtVPyU+0ekql5M74QRcD71B+P2El/Plj4 v8eA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoi5zFqsjvIVDYsM9JwH1aHLHuLg4mWHnpl+jEW2POw9gmEdNglX GnhDigYkn9SVjzOK2YjrMPy5fPGdUIw= X-Received: by 2002:a25:be0f:: with SMTP id h15-v6mr7122614ybk.241.1538086292211; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yb1-f172.google.com (mail-yb1-f172.google.com. [209.85.219.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b7-v6sm2105830ywe.1.2018.09.27.15.11.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f172.google.com with SMTP id w80-v6so1796846ybe.10 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:11:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a25:19c3:: with SMTP id 186-v6mr7051478ybz.410.1538086288195; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:11:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a25:d116:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:11:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180927151119.9989-7-tycho@tycho.ws> References: <20180927151119.9989-1-tycho@tycho.ws> <20180927151119.9989-7-tycho@tycho.ws> From: Kees Cook Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:11:27 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/6] samples: add an example of seccomp user trap To: Tycho Andersen Cc: LKML , Linux Containers , Linux API , Andy Lutomirski , Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W . Biederman" , "Serge E . Hallyn" , Christian Brauner , Tyler Hicks , Akihiro Suda , Jann Horn , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Tycho Andersen wrote: > The idea here is just to give a demonstration of how one could safely use > the SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF feature to do mount policies. This particular > policy is (as noted in the comment) not very interesting, but it serves to > illustrate how one might apply a policy dodging the various TOCTOU issues. > > v5: new in v5 > v7: updates for v7 API changes > > Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen > CC: Kees Cook > CC: Andy Lutomirski > CC: Oleg Nesterov > CC: Eric W. Biederman > CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" > CC: Christian Brauner > CC: Tyler Hicks > CC: Akihiro Suda > --- > samples/seccomp/.gitignore | 1 + > samples/seccomp/Makefile | 7 +- > samples/seccomp/user-trap.c | 312 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/samples/seccomp/.gitignore b/samples/seccomp/.gitignore > index 78fb78184291..d1e2e817d556 100644 > --- a/samples/seccomp/.gitignore > +++ b/samples/seccomp/.gitignore > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > bpf-direct > bpf-fancy > dropper > +user-trap > diff --git a/samples/seccomp/Makefile b/samples/seccomp/Makefile > index cf34ff6b4065..4920903c8009 100644 > --- a/samples/seccomp/Makefile > +++ b/samples/seccomp/Makefile > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > ifndef CROSS_COMPILE > -hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_SECCOMP) := bpf-fancy dropper bpf-direct > +hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_SECCOMP) := bpf-fancy dropper bpf-direct user-trap > > HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include > HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include > @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include > HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include > bpf-direct-objs := bpf-direct.o > > +HOSTCFLAGS_user-trap.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include > +HOSTCFLAGS_user-trap.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include > +user-trap-objs := user-trap.o > + > # Try to match the kernel target. > ifndef CONFIG_64BIT > > @@ -33,6 +37,7 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += $(MFLAG) > HOSTLDLIBS_bpf-direct += $(MFLAG) > HOSTLDLIBS_bpf-fancy += $(MFLAG) > HOSTLDLIBS_dropper += $(MFLAG) > +HOSTLDLIBS_user-trap += $(MFLAG) > endif > always := $(hostprogs-m) > endif > diff --git a/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..63c9a5994dc1 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c > @@ -0,0 +1,312 @@ > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +/* > + * Because of some grossness, we can't include linux/ptrace.h here, so we > + * re-define PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER. > + */ > +#ifndef PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER > +#define PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER 0x420e > +#endif > + > +#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof(*(x))) > + > +static int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args) > +{ > + errno = 0; > + return syscall(__NR_seccomp, op, flags, args); > +} > + > +static int user_trap_syscall(int nr, unsigned int flags) > +{ > + struct sock_filter filter[] = { > + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, > + offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)), > + BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, nr, 0, 1), > + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF), > + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), > + }; > + > + struct sock_fprog prog = { > + .len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter), > + .filter = filter, > + }; > + > + return seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flags, &prog); > +} > + > +static int handle_req(struct seccomp_notif *req, > + struct seccomp_notif_resp *resp, int listener) > +{ > + char path[PATH_MAX], source[PATH_MAX], target[PATH_MAX]; > + int ret = -1, mem; > + > + resp->len = sizeof(*resp); > + resp->id = req->id; > + resp->error = -EPERM; > + resp->val = 0; > + > + if (req->data.nr != __NR_mount) { > + fprintf(stderr, "huh? trapped something besides mknod? %d\n", req->data.nr); > + return -1; > + } > + > + /* Only allow bind mounts. */ > + if (!(req->data.args[3] & MS_BIND)) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * Ok, let's read the task's memory to see where they wanted their > + * mount to go. > + */ > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/proc/%d/mem", req->pid); > + mem = open(path, O_RDONLY); > + if (mem < 0) { > + perror("open mem"); > + return -1; > + } > + > + /* > + * Now we avoid a TOCTOU: we referred to a pid by its pid, but since > + * the pid that made the syscall may have died, we need to confirm that > + * the pid is still valid after we open its /proc/pid/mem file. We can > + * ask the listener fd this as follows. > + * > + * Note that this check should occur *after* any task-specific > + * resources are opened, to make sure that the task has not died and > + * we're not wrongly reading someone else's state in order to make > + * decisions. > + */ > + if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_NOTIF_ID_VALID, &req->id) < 0) { > + fprintf(stderr, "task died before we could map its memory\n"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* > + * Phew, we've got the right /proc/pid/mem. Now we can read it. Note > + * that to avoid another TOCTOU, we should read all of the pointer args > + * before we decide to allow the syscall. > + */ > + if (lseek(mem, req->data.args[0], SEEK_SET) < 0) { > + perror("seek"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + ret = read(mem, source, sizeof(source)); > + if (ret < 0) { > + perror("read"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + if (lseek(mem, req->data.args[1], SEEK_SET) < 0) { > + perror("seek"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + ret = read(mem, target, sizeof(target)); > + if (ret < 0) { > + perror("read"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* > + * Our policy is to only allow bind mounts inside /tmp. This isn't very > + * interesting, because we could do unprivlieged bind mounts with user > + * namespaces already, but you get the idea. > + */ > + if (!strncmp(source, "/tmp", 4) && !strncmp(target, "/tmp", 4)) { > + if (mount(source, target, NULL, req->data.args[3], NULL) < 0) { > + ret = -1; > + perror("actual mount"); > + goto out; > + } > + resp->error = 0; > + } > + > + /* Even if we didn't allow it because of policy, generating the > + * response was be a success, because we want to tell the worker EPERM. > + */ > + ret = 0; > + > +out: > + close(mem); > + return ret; > +} > + > +int main(void) > +{ > + int sk_pair[2], ret = 1, status, listener; > + pid_t worker = 0 , tracer = 0; > + char c; > + > + if (socketpair(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0, sk_pair) < 0) { > + perror("socketpair"); > + return 1; > + } > + > + worker = fork(); > + if (worker < 0) { > + perror("fork"); > + goto close_pair; > + } > + > + if (worker == 0) { > + if (user_trap_syscall(__NR_mount, 0) < 0) { > + perror("seccomp"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + if (setuid(1000) < 0) { > + perror("setuid"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + if (write(sk_pair[1], "a", 1) != 1) { > + perror("write"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + if (read(sk_pair[1], &c, 1) != 1) { > + perror("write"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + if (mkdir("/tmp/foo", 0755) < 0) { > + perror("mkdir"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + if (mount("/dev/sda", "/tmp/foo", NULL, 0, NULL) != -1) { > + fprintf(stderr, "huh? mounted /dev/sda?\n"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + if (errno != EPERM) { > + perror("bad error from mount"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + if (mount("/tmp/foo", "/tmp/foo", NULL, MS_BIND, NULL) < 0) { > + perror("mount"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + exit(0); > + } > + > + if (read(sk_pair[0], &c, 1) != 1) { > + perror("read ready signal"); > + goto out_kill; > + } > + > + if (ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, worker) < 0) { > + perror("ptrace"); > + goto out_kill; > + } > + > + if (waitpid(worker, NULL, 0) != worker) { > + perror("waitpid"); > + goto out_kill; > + } > + > + listener = ptrace(PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER, worker, 0); > + if (listener < 0) { > + perror("ptrace get listener"); > + goto out_kill; > + } > + > + if (ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, worker, NULL, 0) < 0) { > + perror("ptrace detach"); > + goto out_kill; > + } > + > + if (write(sk_pair[0], "a", 1) != 1) { > + perror("write"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + tracer = fork(); > + if (tracer < 0) { > + perror("fork"); > + goto out_kill; > + } > + > + if (tracer == 0) { > + while (1) { > + struct seccomp_notif req = {}; > + struct seccomp_notif_resp resp = {}; > + > + req.len = sizeof(req); > + if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_NOTIF_RECV, &req) != sizeof(req)) { > + perror("ioctl recv"); > + goto out_close; > + } > + > + if (handle_req(&req, &resp, listener) < 0) > + goto out_close; > + > + if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_NOTIF_SEND, &resp) != sizeof(resp)) { > + perror("ioctl send"); > + goto out_close; > + } > + } > +out_close: > + close(listener); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + close(listener); > + > + if (waitpid(worker, &status, 0) != worker) { > + perror("waitpid"); > + goto out_kill; > + } > + > + if (umount2("/tmp/foo", MNT_DETACH) < 0 && errno != EINVAL) { > + perror("umount2"); > + goto out_kill; > + } > + > + if (remove("/tmp/foo") < 0 && errno != ENOENT) { > + perror("remove"); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + if (!WIFEXITED(status) || WEXITSTATUS(status)) { > + fprintf(stderr, "worker exited nonzero\n"); > + goto out_kill; > + } > + > + ret = 0; > + > +out_kill: > + if (tracer > 0) > + kill(tracer, SIGKILL); > + if (worker > 0) > + kill(worker, SIGKILL); > + > +close_pair: > + close(sk_pair[0]); > + close(sk_pair[1]); > + return ret; > +} > -- > 2.17.1 > handle_req() is well commented, but main() isn't. Since this is explicitly a "sample", can you add operational comments to main() as well? I think it might help people follow what is happening (and what is expected) during main(). Beyond that, yay! Samples! :) -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security