Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp776731imm; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 06:42:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV604EEBiThFdf3ib5fc7lwSrGhAs4zs8rOeja6FisFEl6NoM8iF6gOPEGdkTLTueGCjTgRCn X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6bc5:: with SMTP id m5-v6mr16253969plt.274.1538142132660; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 06:42:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538142132; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gxihoVyULK3HdJpBrpNvhFRK/t908T5kBtMjpf93Ax1ofNZJkKTu4R2YG15pdMHFc5 6H6B2rCSvkfTQ+tQtNQuaKC++T0JOr3juNbDQtBBjYutGy79BgngSvBq5yo4BArAg2KJ G9OiBWrBTbfWlsyyUgSY8Ailk2wW7sh8xBhJTUhz19WtomDAm8pxjbmha1VTkXuzJHG9 lBHvatyq5Ypkarg2wNDqSvRIcubA4PfzINdv6ZRGhAWeHknPKNlelhYWKeTsOg65BhYZ Ytgo+dxrNhFoJj9fwzny5oIjGK92ndSj7PsrK3btlxdLGhpJDDSQ51IctxVn+93XD0IE Tr/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=zqSL7vRDQ080t2Y2QWJNMFz1kLwuGw+AnX8CyYI7JvI=; b=WVQWiFJ/2ofY6k7Lq3HPdCCUNF768LxPEACAe5IbOE7RRANjaynsZEarlUoluZ55hi lm/bzDNClNjuNoQIOFf3+pRA7tRLpuE9guRkp9RlAww/YEOMZMuAPP4T/plMe/LG9AdC j06Z0cHp4Jx5lvUwg4g+MaUVNwiK+zRNNLbhyu+LaByjXEzqdV/VkYUYZomrn4F390/I kxTnhw8Yo7jISeurTkdWdWorH5/p/IgxZNFafefeFXYxSDHRzJtlrBG2kRYfAMWskdpa M7g+58YhvIOPSBX1fchN9P8Gw1AGX7FDIa1n9XEvzdLrXZBquiLBPuaQJL8FAgPgZgk0 5FUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e17-v6si4308703pgv.54.2018.09.28.06.41.55; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 06:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729178AbeI1UEx (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:04:53 -0400 Received: from cheddar.halon.org.uk ([93.93.131.118]:54218 "EHLO cheddar.halon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726603AbeI1UEx (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:04:53 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1309 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:04:52 EDT Received: from bsmtp by cheddar.halon.org.uk with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <93sam@debian.org>) id 1g5sfm-0002V2-RM; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:19:10 +0100 Received: from steve by tack.einval.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <93sam@debian.org>) id 1g5sep-0002TO-Dh; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:18:11 +0100 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:18:11 +0100 From: Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org> To: Will Deacon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux@dominikbrodowski.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, oleg@redhat.com, dave.martin@arm.com Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Don't use SIGMINSTKSZ when enforcing alternative signal stack size for compat tasks Message-ID: <20180928131805.aunjzciyvaad7z5a@tack.einval.com> References: <1536158083-30166-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <20180926103627.b6kxzdmqqsj3545h@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180926103627.b6kxzdmqqsj3545h@arm.com> X-attached: none User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ Re-sending without the corporate footer garbage... ] On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >Hi all, > >This is a resend of: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html > >now based on 4.19-rc2. > >The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite >when running under a 64-bit kernel. They tracked this down to sigaltstack(2) >enforcing the alternative signal stack to be at least SIGMINSTKSZ bytes, >which is higher for native arm64 tasks than compat 32-bit tasks. > >These patches resolve the issue by allowing an architecture to define >COMPAT_SIGMINSTKSZ for compat tasks, which is then used by the sigaltstack >checking code. > >Feedback welcome, Apologies for the delayed response here - conference travel etc . got in the way... I've just tested and I can confirm that this patchset fixes our reported bug (as in https://bugs.debian.org/904385). Thanks Will! Tested-by: Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org> -- Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org>