Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1538180205.14753.20.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] PCI: mediatek: Convert to use pci_host_probe()
From:   Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
To:     Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
CC:     <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
        <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>,
        <yt.shen@mediatek.com>, <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Sep 2018 08:16:45 +0800
In-Reply-To: <1538149277.23182.7.camel@mtkswgap22>
References: <1538129080-8206-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
         <1538129080-8206-5-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
         <1538149277.23182.7.camel@mtkswgap22>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 23:41 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 18:04 +0800, honghui.zhang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Part of mtk_pcie_register_host is an open-coded version of
> > pci_host_probe(). So instead of duplicating this code, use
> > pci_host_probe() directly and remove mtk_pcie_register_host.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 37 ++++++++--------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> > index e2c4127..cbf4543 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> > @@ -1125,34 +1125,6 @@ static int mtk_pcie_request_resources(struct mtk_pcie *pcie)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int mtk_pcie_register_host(struct pci_host_bridge *host)
> > -{
> > -	struct mtk_pcie *pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(host);
> > -	struct pci_bus *child;
> > -	int err;
> 
> To make the patch simple, could we keep these host->*. and return
> pci_host_probe() directly?

Well, I guess it's not necessary to keep the mtk_pcie_register_host just
wrap pci_host_probe(). Put those host->* directly in probe function is
no harm, it will reduce one function call and related parameter passing.

I may update this patch to keep the mtk_pcie_register_host if you insist
though I prefer the current way.

Thanks.
> 
> > -	host->busnr = pcie->busn.start;
> > -	host->dev.parent = pcie->dev;
> > -	host->ops = pcie->soc->ops;
> > -	host->map_irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci;
> > -	host->swizzle_irq = pci_common_swizzle;
> > -	host->sysdata = pcie;
> > -
> > -	err = pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(host);
> > -	if (err < 0)
> > -		return err;
> > -
> > -	pci_bus_size_bridges(host->bus);
> > -	pci_bus_assign_resources(host->bus);
> > -
> > -	list_for_each_entry(child, &host->bus->children, node)
> > -		pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> > -
> > -	pci_bus_add_devices(host->bus);
> > -
> > -	return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> >  static int mtk_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -1179,7 +1151,14 @@ static int mtk_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (err)
> >  		goto put_resources;
> >  
> > -	err = mtk_pcie_register_host(host);
> > +	host->busnr = pcie->busn.start;
> > +	host->dev.parent = pcie->dev;
> > +	host->ops = pcie->soc->ops;
> > +	host->map_irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci;
> > +	host->swizzle_irq = pci_common_swizzle;
> > +	host->sysdata = pcie;
> > +
> > +	err = pci_host_probe(host);
> >  	if (err)
> >  		goto put_resources;
> >  
> 
>