Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1758940imm; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:32:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61KqLruK40+uZuAiwOaJO5gjhDF44KH39KhfiW82RrIhvpgTZwXXDDMybi+qtAc08ShQmYF X-Received: by 2002:a62:6104:: with SMTP id v4-v6mr2616918pfb.122.1538217141311; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:32:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538217141; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=al7psf+n1LjpUsOsXXOxJjxKvfiMSrCqpGuFfFWDUNMqFxRAfgLEVDue9WeHHyPEfx Y1EOJa/+YX8TfnnlcM2ar6wCXMpqhuHbJTEdMfpJdWMDPnpR1mW3hcUsw2qoEHjrg6/q cfmsXqL2NnWL5VPiHJ07vLlvZMyMsP7q+6yXhM3iyPk4y8k1qVag29K2d8tcFF0y69e3 dOQz5yJpuPm9e0x/+csSRtRQAwUydW96+qGVVWeAX6OBZr9a5Pr7/iLdi0QBBHZ2DWab 15OCAxu5B1I6fKyKADus1xV6Kgb8al4KQRNeIx19Tk67cUioCQMxBuIbSFNf2KdAt1rq adsg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=rKIwzjVxTOfyOJd99IJwQnjRxKhFlJ+gw1m+RsC2asA=; b=nuH85Vb0xxw2bOCA7gg0Yt1W5wAw5Snp+C9u388L9rjjobSWvybhz54YwXetmcAWTc iwt93zDfVC7Mrxu1QS/u5N4c49RSdZBNyK+SNqBm3/VfK7PatxsCFhVorb/o+2vMnvPR e5BN0PF5wMqY2vOcXjn48g2251DLTw4nyBH+nZt+UIW8CG3hYSgdLncZIFCA/G0MgYWl hHjds98NIDhSM3Iehu2WTqHf3p/HTQ598kbK7ob3FdwP8jgcmAuY8/CtunO4dLnE8Am6 YqKEWjz6rv63i0w9bn5zV4++JcwWacI7M5Z1rrDEW4iSJazIVdRIMEVHyVb7GULS+/Q+ qASA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15-v6si7361296pfj.260.2018.09.29.03.32.07; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728072AbeI2Q7q (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:59:46 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:47266 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727756AbeI2Q7o (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:59:44 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8TAThUN033619 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 06:31:49 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2mt5d53fk5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 06:31:49 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:31:47 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:31:43 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w8TAVgj360227646 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:31:42 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1112FA4040; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 13:31:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EDEA4051; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 13:31:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.207.35]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 13:31:20 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 13:31:39 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Peter Xu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Jerome Glisse , Mike Kravetz , linux-mm@kvack.org, Zi Yan , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li , Andrea Arcangeli , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] userfaultfd: selftest: generalize read and poll References: <20180929084311.15600-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20180929084311.15600-3-peterx@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180929084311.15600-3-peterx@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18092910-4275-0000-0000-000002C29B2C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18092910-4276-0000-0000-000037CDA123 Message-Id: <20180929103138.GB6429@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-09-29_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809290111 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 04:43:10PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > We do very similar things in read and poll modes, but we're copying the > codes around. Share the codes properly on reading the message and > handling the page fault to make the code cleaner. Meanwhile this solves > previous mismatch of behaviors between the two modes on that the old > code: > > - did not check EAGAIN case in read() mode > - ignored BOUNCE_VERIFY check in read() mode > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu > --- > tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 76 +++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c > index 2a84adaf8cf8..f79706f13ce7 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c > @@ -449,6 +449,42 @@ static int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset) > return __copy_page(ufd, offset, false); > } > > +static int uffd_read_msg(int ufd, struct uffd_msg *msg) > +{ > + int ret = read(uffd, msg, sizeof(*msg)); > + > + if (ret != sizeof(*msg)) { > + if (ret < 0) I'd appreciate curly brace here > + if (errno == EAGAIN) > + return 1; > + else > + perror("blocking read error"), exit(1); > + else and here > + fprintf(stderr, "short read\n"), exit(1); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* Return 1 if page fault handled by us; otherwise 0 */ > +static int uffd_handle_page_fault(struct uffd_msg *msg) > +{ > + unsigned long offset; > + > + if (msg->event != UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT) > + fprintf(stderr, "unexpected msg event %u\n", > + msg->event), exit(1); > + > + if (bounces & BOUNCE_VERIFY && > + msg->arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE) > + fprintf(stderr, "unexpected write fault\n"), exit(1); > + > + offset = (char *)(unsigned long)msg->arg.pagefault.address - area_dst; > + offset &= ~(page_size-1); > + > + return copy_page(uffd, offset); > +} > + > static void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg) > { > unsigned long cpu = (unsigned long) arg; > @@ -456,7 +492,6 @@ static void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg) > struct uffd_msg msg; > struct uffdio_register uffd_reg; > int ret; > - unsigned long offset; > char tmp_chr; > unsigned long userfaults = 0; > > @@ -480,25 +515,15 @@ static void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg) > if (!(pollfd[0].revents & POLLIN)) > fprintf(stderr, "pollfd[0].revents %d\n", > pollfd[0].revents), exit(1); > - ret = read(uffd, &msg, sizeof(msg)); > - if (ret < 0) { > - if (errno == EAGAIN) > - continue; > - perror("nonblocking read error"), exit(1); > - } > + if (uffd_read_msg(uffd, &msg)) > + continue; > switch (msg.event) { > default: > fprintf(stderr, "unexpected msg event %u\n", > msg.event), exit(1); > break; > case UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT: > - if (msg.arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE) > - fprintf(stderr, "unexpected write fault\n"), exit(1); > - offset = (char *)(unsigned long)msg.arg.pagefault.address - > - area_dst; > - offset &= ~(page_size-1); > - if (copy_page(uffd, offset)) > - userfaults++; > + userfaults += uffd_handle_page_fault(&msg); > break; > case UFFD_EVENT_FORK: > close(uffd); > @@ -526,8 +551,6 @@ static void *uffd_read_thread(void *arg) > { > unsigned long *this_cpu_userfaults; > struct uffd_msg msg; > - unsigned long offset; > - int ret; > > this_cpu_userfaults = (unsigned long *) arg; > *this_cpu_userfaults = 0; > @@ -536,24 +559,9 @@ static void *uffd_read_thread(void *arg) > /* from here cancellation is ok */ > > for (;;) { > - ret = read(uffd, &msg, sizeof(msg)); > - if (ret != sizeof(msg)) { > - if (ret < 0) > - perror("blocking read error"), exit(1); > - else > - fprintf(stderr, "short read\n"), exit(1); > - } > - if (msg.event != UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT) > - fprintf(stderr, "unexpected msg event %u\n", > - msg.event), exit(1); > - if (bounces & BOUNCE_VERIFY && > - msg.arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE) > - fprintf(stderr, "unexpected write fault\n"), exit(1); > - offset = (char *)(unsigned long)msg.arg.pagefault.address - > - area_dst; > - offset &= ~(page_size-1); > - if (copy_page(uffd, offset)) > - (*this_cpu_userfaults)++; > + if (uffd_read_msg(uffd, &msg)) > + continue; > + (*this_cpu_userfaults) += uffd_handle_page_fault(&msg); > } > return (void *)NULL; > } > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.