Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264372AbTKURJp (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:09:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264373AbTKURJp (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:09:45 -0500 Received: from the-penguin.otak.com ([65.37.126.18]:3712 "EHLO the-penguin.otak.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264372AbTKURJn (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:09:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:09:33 -0800 From: Lawrence Walton To: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Opps on boot 2.6.0-pre9-mm4 Message-ID: <20031121170933.GA1269@the-penguin.otak.com> References: <20031120193318.GA5578@the-penguin.otak.com> <20031120131945.3cd35911.akpm@osdl.org> <20031120233006.GA1331@the-penguin.otak.com> <20031120160601.6b1fbd53.akpm@osdl.org> <20031120210953.GA25417@neo.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031120210953.GA25417@neo.rr.com> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.0-test9-mm4 on an i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2213 Lines: 60 Adam Belay [ambx1@neo.rr.com] wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 04:06:01PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Lawrence Walton wrote: > > > > > > > Looks like it died inside the machine's BIOS. > > > > > > > > Please try reverting the three pnp patches: > > > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test9/2.6.0-test9-mm4/broken-out/pnp-fix-3.patch > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test9/2.6.0-test9-mm4/broken-out/pnp-fix-2.patch > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test9/2.6.0-test9-mm4/broken-out/pnp-fix-1.patch > > > > > > > > and let us know? > > > > > > > I reverted these and it works great! > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Upgrade the bios > > > The bios is the latest so updating it would not of been a option. > > > > > > > OK, thanks. Adam, those pnp patches are suspect... > > Hmm, well it couldn't be patch 3 because it relates to isapnp. Patch > 1 is the only patch that changes the PnPBIOS calls, and it has been > known to fix problems for some systems. Also it does what the actual > specifications recommend. You may just have a buggy system that's > triggered by the static resource calls. If so, we could use dynamic > instead resources when the DMI scan matches with this system. Patch > 2 provides an option to disable the PnPBIOS proc interface, but it > should not affect PnPBIOS calls. > > Lawrence, could you please test this again, only this time excluding > patch 1 and no others. If that doesn't work try excluding patch 2. > > Thanks, > Adam > > P.S. Adam this worked great too. My guess is that this board is a little different. It's a Asus A7V333 with fireiwire and the raid. -- *--* Mail: lawrence@otak.com *--* Voice: 425.739.4247 *--* Fax: 425.827.9577 *--* HTTP://www.otak-k.com/~lawrence/ -------------------------------------- - - - - - - O t a k i n c . - - - - - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/