Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180929103453.12025-1-cyphar@cyphar.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180929103453.12025-1-cyphar@cyphar.com>
From:   Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>
Date:   Sun, 30 Sep 2018 15:54:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CADZs7q5mFGMvtbAHzjKdC8b7byz8pvBOaLBOTxnXRwTZ1LfCAw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] namei: implement various scoping AT_* flags
To:     cyphar@cyphar.com
Cc:     jlayton@kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, arnd@arndb.de,
        shuah@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org,
        christian@brauner.io, "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        tycho@tycho.ws, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        dev <dev@opencontainers.org>,
        Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        jsafrane@redhat.com, msau@google.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 12:35 PM Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> wrote:
>
> The need for some sort of control over VFS's path resolution (to avoid
> malicious paths resulting in inadvertent breakouts) has been a very
> long-standing desire of many userspace applications. This patchset is a
> revival of Al Viro's old AT_NO_JUMPS[1] patchset with a few additions.
>
> The most obvious change is that AT_NO_JUMPS has been split as dicussed
> in the original thread, along with a further split of AT_NO_PROCLINKS
> which means that each individual property of AT_NO_JUMPS is now a
> separate flag:
>
>   * Path-based escapes from the starting-point using "/" or ".." are
>     blocked by AT_BENEATH.
>   * Mountpoint crossings are blocked by AT_XDEV.
>   * /proc/$pid/fd/$fd resolution is blocked by AT_NO_PROCLINKS (more
>         correctly it actually blocks any user of nd_jump_link() because it
>         allows out-of-VFS path resolution manipulation).
>
> AT_NO_JUMPS is now effectively (AT_BENEATH|AT_XDEV|AT_NO_PROCLINKS). At
> Linus' suggestion in the original thread, I've also implemented
> AT_NO_SYMLINKS which just denies _all_ symlink resolution (including
> "proclink" resolution).

It seems quite useful to me.

> An additional improvement was made to AT_XDEV. The original AT_NO_JUMPS
> path didn't consider "/tmp/.." as a mountpoint crossing -- this patch
> blocks this as well (feel free to ask me to remove it if you feel this
> is not sane).
>
> Currently I've only enabled these for openat(2) and the stat(2) family.
> I would hope we could enable it for basically every *at(2) syscall --
> but many of them appear to not have a @flags argument and thus we'll
> need to add several new syscalls to do this. I'm more than happy to send
> those patches, but I'd prefer to know that this preliminary work is
> acceptable before doing a bunch of copy-paste to add new sets of *at(2)
> syscalls.

What do you think of an equivalent feature AT_NO_SYMLINKS flag for mount()?

I guess that would have made the fix for CVE-2017-1002101 in
Kubernetes easier to write:
https://kubernetes.io/blog/2018/04/04/fixing-subpath-volume-vulnerability/

> One additional feature I've implemented is AT_THIS_ROOT (I imagine this
> is probably going to be more contentious than the refresh of
> AT_NO_JUMPS, so I've included it in a separate patch). The patch itself
> describes my reasoning, but the shortened version of the premise is that
> continer runtimes need to have a way to resolve paths within a
> potentially malicious rootfs. Container runtimes currently do this in
> userspace[2] which has implicit race conditions that are not resolvable
> in userspace (or use fork+exec+chroot and SCM_RIGHTS passing which is
> inefficient). AT_THIS_ROOT allows for per-call chroot-like semantics for
> path resolution, which would be invaluable for us -- and the
> implementation is basically identical to AT_BENEATH (except that we
> don't return errors when someone actually hits the root).
>
> I've added some selftests for this, but it's not clear to me whether
> they should live here or in xfstests (as far as I can tell there are no
> other VFS tests in selftests, while there are some tests that look like
> generic VFS tests in xfstests). If you'd prefer them to be included in
> xfstests, let me know.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/784221/
> [2]: https://github.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoin
>
> Aleksa Sarai (3):
>   namei: implement O_BENEATH-style AT_* flags
>   namei: implement AT_THIS_ROOT chroot-like path resolution
>   selftests: vfs: add AT_* path resolution tests
>
>  fs/fcntl.c                                    |   2 +-
>  fs/namei.c                                    | 158 ++++++++++++------
>  fs/open.c                                     |  10 ++
>  fs/stat.c                                     |  15 +-
>  include/linux/fcntl.h                         |   3 +-
>  include/linux/namei.h                         |   8 +
>  include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h              |  20 +++
>  include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h                    |  10 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/Makefile              |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vfs/.gitignore        |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vfs/Makefile          |  13 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/vfs/at_flags.h        |  40 +++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/vfs/common.sh         |  37 ++++
>  .../selftests/vfs/tests/0001_at_beneath.sh    |  72 ++++++++
>  .../selftests/vfs/tests/0002_at_xdev.sh       |  54 ++++++
>  .../vfs/tests/0003_at_no_proclinks.sh         |  50 ++++++
>  .../vfs/tests/0004_at_no_symlinks.sh          |  49 ++++++
>  .../selftests/vfs/tests/0005_at_this_root.sh  |  66 ++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/vfs/vfs_helper.c      | 154 +++++++++++++++++
>  19 files changed, 707 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/.gitignore
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/at_flags.h
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/common.sh
>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/tests/0001_at_beneath.sh
>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/tests/0002_at_xdev.sh
>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/tests/0003_at_no_proclinks.sh
>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/tests/0004_at_no_symlinks.sh
>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/tests/0005_at_this_root.sh
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vfs/vfs_helper.c
>
> --
> 2.19.0