Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264436AbTKUUOg (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:14:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264437AbTKUUOf (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:14:35 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:53678 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264436AbTKUUOP (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:14:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:14:08 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Pavel Machek Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: ionice kills vanilla 2.6.0-test9 was [Re: [PATCH] cfq + io priorities (fwd)] Message-ID: <20031121201408.GF6616@suse.de> References: <20031113124510.GZ643@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <20031121153900.GA193@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031121153900.GA193@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 989 Lines: 31 On Fri, Nov 21 2003, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > I'm attaching the simple ionice tool. It's used as follows: > > > > Here's one that works, sorry about that. To compile: > > > > # gcc -Wall -D__X86 -o ionice ionice.c > > > > or other define for PPC or X86_64. > > Well, did that, run it on vanilla kernel, and it kills the > machine. Can someone reproduce it? I saw that on ppc too, btw, didn't trace it yet. But there definitely is a problem with calling syscalls that don't exist. > [What is needed to start using cfq? Is your patch, this utility and > elevator=cfq enough?] Yes, that is it. Your result may vary though, I have a newer cfq that's almost ready for release that fixes varies performance problems. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/