Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:14:27 +1000
From:   Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To:     Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, dev@opencontainers.org,
        containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] namei: implement various scoping AT_* flags
Message-ID: <20181001061427.GR31060@dastard>
References: <20180929103453.12025-1-cyphar@cyphar.com>
 <20181001040821.GP31060@dastard>
 <20181001054723.lekp3nqgctdyly7m@ryuk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181001054723.lekp3nqgctdyly7m@ryuk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:47:23PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2018-10-01, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > > I've added some selftests for this, but it's not clear to me whether
> > > they should live here or in xfstests (as far as I can tell there are no
> > > other VFS tests in selftests, while there are some tests that look like
> > > generic VFS tests in xfstests). If you'd prefer them to be included in
> > > xfstests, let me know.
> > 
> > xfstests, please. That way the new functionality will get immediate
> > coverage by all the main filesystem development and distro QA
> > teams....
> 
> Sure, will do. Do you want me to submit them in parallel --

That's usually the way we do things, but we don't tend to commit the
fstests changes until the thing it is testing has landed upstream.

> and what is
> the correct ML to submit changes to xfstests?

fstests@vger.kernel.org

> Sorry for the silly questions. :P

You're going to have many more of them when you start moving the
tests across to fstests :P

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com