Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] perf: Per PMU access controls (paranoid setting)
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
References: <20180919122751.12439-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809281151190.2004@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <e89ec139-1a97-803e-343c-76eedf244d65@linux.intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809281542180.2004@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <0feb9867-0040-0306-a95b-4b6df1818312@linux.intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809281932040.1432@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Organization: Intel Corp.
Message-ID: <044ce172-f0fb-4a78-e624-797b5bfe002c@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:25:10 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809281932040.1432@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On 28.09.2018 21:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
<SNIP>
> Start with something like Documentation/admin-guide/perf-security.rst or
> whatever name fits better and add a proper documentation for the existing
> knob. With the infrastructure for fine grained access control add the
> general explanation for fine grained access control. With each PMU which
> opt's in for the knob, add a section with guidance about scope and risk for
> this particular one.

Sounds like a plan. Thanks!

BR,
Alexey

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> 
> 
>