Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp621566imm; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 15:47:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60SGmfit8s+HN4EfWcSmfphWU8W8LxXTSSWOkHq+9qCKgcxQ+tp7Ex3+TJUHNR+GqKINQzj X-Received: by 2002:a63:6203:: with SMTP id w3-v6mr11988029pgb.53.1538434066105; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 15:47:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538434066; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BJvybvNKX+BN0ogqkuDdaDSfXOtU1W9ZoIbS8OpWybuJT58iqP3p8xiTF6h/65LkSh F31vMWetEAdptIvp7JAki0Zr7cZn99UmkG5MmYQ5VCr+o8Y/BcsbNma7c+DUVY/5mu0i SnLMNrroH44cigBy0Jx4El0j/dmt/Sgst5lmoJxk9Om4gDHJvlMqxNqsT59Rtb0Osfns elHbi+iSz0SMYOgUomy1HrbuB498bw6uSi2x+f9/vD+Mp2jQ0e4YZ4K+ztS62jYiiuT7 KX3yeWZogLLCFtE1ZXYp3vqHQsfOgnUuP6tKdhlffBZUEqmSFihknbQ95PMXwcNFwHlO jqDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=UMzJokdN836gOh5JAgIVLjCkTlz0ooJGNhxCcGJyP+w=; b=rWQ6/s9X641onHNSz5gep6T64S8CFFU+MUiTpbgGqna2f3DpSQJzZ8pPybsnL8RaO9 3cEg5iuwj4JnUrLe/b/6Q2EXm+sf57I/aSZmFMAYOEQcXkWgtciq3yrr6Fg7T2cCWLnj j2nNWva562NteEZnABpW3qftF4o1OQkBXbjOlb3u6NAWNPvyNqdM8aU6avKf4lUwqF3m HoFPDizaoz3SkHxsPHrOA/EZY08/oz0g8HhtfqlEXvvGTzD26SKhdOz3a1xE5CJTmb44 7EwU4EPLDZkMKqTf4hkrylPdWGczjh/r2QEmHcUplm3DyiIH7tKT1M9+yrlzkJbsmQbl QCUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=oPwhyJMe; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m8-v6si13295480plt.22.2018.10.01.15.47.31; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 15:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=oPwhyJMe; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726701AbeJBF0M (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Oct 2018 01:26:12 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-f66.google.com ([209.85.161.66]:46164 "EHLO mail-yw1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725878AbeJBF0M (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2018 01:26:12 -0400 Received: by mail-yw1-f66.google.com with SMTP id j202-v6so1748784ywa.13 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 15:46:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UMzJokdN836gOh5JAgIVLjCkTlz0ooJGNhxCcGJyP+w=; b=oPwhyJMemd0B4pNTa9TnSGo0z51tzG9fA7HhMGTMc7mr3rAZvdxdFtBpA9nbLou/rH bUC6MGt26lYWo1p+/IcqVeyOT7lTa4b0Fiuu7i0xElg4vblKUwuW24B1dlnSqBEWTBTC ShTLjvl2Ki9YeDtkNox/KUgQ1L7M1WBgPNSfo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UMzJokdN836gOh5JAgIVLjCkTlz0ooJGNhxCcGJyP+w=; b=DAvsPsNvCtT3qFQmsL43DiPfdVFDebIQ/IHYRq8FM4Yr6NYd4WKJyZDhkowY88xdXt yCONEChHBXvMehBf/YkzecdZkofASmdU/Vu6L4Uul77vw6d9BPoaoH1hRwnjekYs9Cbj uQQGcHHXmr2wa+pqWdT9P480/5wluMj34b6I2ftufigNongPHnfcHUiSI7jJS1Y3ZnO/ Ss7l7wE86PnA9+rkB9Pi3wIFZSZaViQkQvJR/1csXI6hjZX3bBdzA7Vto1en/tV/UVR2 ylS9DTDSQww4gwxGPZdklLt3Vn36tiR493pK6OgGQVRZn5c/vQdHNrx29+rBMnMNr2Ql oFNA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohIdWg19+1qKC7NyGqllxe9NRv7xvsRW5Mu86EAEE6KdK5oGVMh 9NR8ESAq873UlXIQRILtZ0s/igsVX1o= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:e984:: with SMTP id s126-v6mr7219979ywe.253.1538433967954; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 15:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw1-f47.google.com (mail-yw1-f47.google.com. [209.85.161.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p128-v6sm7164063ywp.65.2018.10.01.15.46.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Oct 2018 15:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-f47.google.com with SMTP id a197-v6so2248671ywh.9 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 15:46:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a81:2908:: with SMTP id p8-v6mr7166457ywp.407.1538433536573; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 15:38:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a25:d116:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 15:38:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20181001172315.225d18dc@gandalf.local.home> References: <20180925001832.18322-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20180925001832.18322-5-keescook@chromium.org> <20181001172315.225d18dc@gandalf.local.home> From: Kees Cook Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 15:38:55 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing To: Steven Rostedt Cc: John Johansen , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Abderrahmane Benbachir , linux-security-module , Casey Schaufler , Tetsuo Handa , Paul Moore , Stephen Smalley , "Schaufler, Casey" , Jonathan Corbet , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-arch , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:07:55 -0700 > John Johansen wrote: > >> On 09/24/2018 05:18 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> > This partially reverts commit 58eacfffc417 ("init, tracing: instrument >> > security and console initcall trace events") since security init calls >> > are about to no longer resemble regular init calls. >> > >> > Cc: James Morris >> > Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" >> > Cc: Abderrahmane Benbachir >> > Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) >> > Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org >> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >> >> >> Reviewed-by: John Johansen >> >> though I do think it would be a good idea to add a new set >> of trace points, but that can come as a separate patch >> >> > > Agreed. BTW, how would this look? I'm not familiar with adding new tracepoints... -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security