Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] x86: jump_label: introduce
 ASM_STATIC_KEY_INIT_{TRUE,FALSE}
To:     Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
References: <20180919220444.23190-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
 <20180919220444.23190-22-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Message-ID: <395d8874-40c7-3703-48a8-2a7ee232f49b@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 10:21:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180919220444.23190-22-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2018-09-20 00:04, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> These will be useful when defining the contents of (a struct containing)
> a static key in inline assembly.

May I politely ask someone in the x86 camp to comment on patches
21,22,23 in this series? If the memory savings is deemed
not-worth-the-asm-complexity, a number of preparatory patches become
pointless, and I'd like to figure out which ones I should ask Andrew to
pick up.

Thanks,
Rasmus