Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc:     linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Alessia Mantegazza <amantegazza@vaga.pv.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc:it_IT: add some process/* translations
Date:   Tue, 02 Oct 2018 10:43:10 +0200
Message-ID: <1608921.jop3HA6fpD@pcbe13614>
In-Reply-To: <20180920143511.26136ddd@lwn.net>
References: <20180909161641.3792-1-federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> <20180920142957.09000163@lwn.net> <20180920143511.26136ddd@lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jon,

I was on a long holiday. I will re-send a V2 patch without that document in 
the next days

On Thursday, September 20, 2018 10:35:11 PM CEST Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:29:57 -0600
> 
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> > On Sun,  9 Sep 2018 18:16:41 +0200
> > 
> > Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> wrote:
> > > This patch does not translate entirely the subfolder "process/"
> > > but only part of it (to begin with).
> > > 
> > > In order to avoid broken links, I included empty documents
> > > for those which are not yet translated.
> > > 
> > > In order to be able to refer to all documents in "process/",
> > > I added a sphinx label to those which had not one.
> > > 
> > > Translated documents:
> > > - howto
> > > - 1.Intro
> > > - clang-format
> > > - coding-style
> > > - kernel-driver-statement
> > > - magic-number
> > > - volatile-considered-harmful
> > > - development-process
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alessia Mantegazza <amantegazza@vaga.pv.it>
> > 
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> Actually, I just backed that out, sorry.  There's an immediate conflict
> with -next over code-of-conflict.rst that is best avoided, and there is
> no point in adding a translation of the old code. If you can respin the
> patch set without that change, I'll apply it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon


-- 
Federico Vaga
http://www.federicovaga.it/