Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263262AbTKWEX3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:23:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263267AbTKWEX3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:23:29 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:32459 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263262AbTKWEX2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:23:28 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:23:16 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Andi Kleen cc: md@Linux.IT, Subject: Re: irq 15: nobody cared! with KT600 chipset and 2.6.0-test9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 666 Lines: 20 On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Andi Kleen wrote: > > It's a long standing bug in how we handle VIA on board devices in ACPI. > It was a big problem on x86-64 too until I cheated and used only > PIC mode when there is a VIA southbridge. That doesn't explain the lack of autodetection, and the early irq15 registration. That would explain why no interrupts make it at all, but why do we not even probe for irq15 here? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/