Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263267AbTKWFJj (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2003 00:09:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263274AbTKWFJi (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2003 00:09:38 -0500 Received: from colin2.muc.de ([193.149.48.15]:63505 "HELO colin2.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263267AbTKWFJi (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2003 00:09:38 -0500 Date: 23 Nov 2003 06:10:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 06:10:11 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andi Kleen , md@Linux.IT, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: irq 15: nobody cared! with KT600 chipset and 2.6.0-test9 Message-ID: <20031123051011.GA92830@colin2.muc.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 813 Lines: 22 On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 08:23:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > It's a long standing bug in how we handle VIA on board devices in ACPI. > > It was a big problem on x86-64 too until I cheated and used only > > PIC mode when there is a VIA southbridge. > > That doesn't explain the lack of autodetection, and the early irq15 > registration. > > That would explain why no interrupts make it at all, but why do we not > even probe for irq15 here? It's easy to test. does it work when booted with "noapic" ? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/