Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263343AbTKWKaJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2003 05:30:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263357AbTKWKaJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2003 05:30:09 -0500 Received: from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2]:461 "EHLO attila.bofh.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263343AbTKWKaG (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2003 05:30:06 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 11:29:53 +0100 From: "Marco d'Itri" To: Andi Kleen Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com Subject: Re: irq 15: nobody cared! with KT600 chipset and 2.6.0-test9 Message-ID: <20031123102953.GA1852@wonderland.linux.it> References: <20031123051011.GA92830@colin2.muc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031123051011.GA92830@colin2.muc.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 949 Lines: 27 On Nov 23, Andi Kleen wrote: >On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 08:23:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Andi Kleen wrote: >> > >> > It's a long standing bug in how we handle VIA on board devices in ACPI. >> > It was a big problem on x86-64 too until I cheated and used only >> > PIC mode when there is a VIA southbridge. >> >> That doesn't explain the lack of autodetection, and the early irq15 >> registration. >> >> That would explain why no interrupts make it at all, but why do we not >> even probe for irq15 here? > >It's easy to test. does it work when booted with "noapic" ? Yes, I checked again. -- ciao, | Marco | [3232 ma6tjQg3wBT1w] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/