Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:16:59 +0100
From:   Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com,
        patrick.bellasi@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, thara.gopinath@linaro.org,
        viresh.kumar@linaro.org, tkjos@google.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
        smuckle@google.com, adharmap@codeaurora.org,
        skannan@codeaurora.org, pkondeti@codeaurora.org,
        juri.lelli@redhat.com, edubezval@gmail.com,
        srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, currojerez@riseup.net,
        javi.merino@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] sched/topology: Reference the Energy Model of
 CPUs when available
Message-ID: <20181002131657.7lysubukna4tkjly@queper01-lin>
References: <20180912091309.7551-1-quentin.perret@arm.com>
 <20180912091309.7551-7-quentin.perret@arm.com>
 <20181002123617.GB3439@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181002123617.GB3439@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tuesday 02 Oct 2018 at 14:36:17 (+0200), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:13:01AM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > +struct perf_domain {
> > +	struct em_perf_domain *obj;
> > +	struct perf_domain *next;
> > +	struct rcu_head rcu;
> > +};
> 
> Maybe s/obj/em_pd/ or something like that? @obj is so very opaque.

I wanted to avoid calling it just 'pd' since that could be confusing. So
anything different than that is fine by me. I don't have a better
suggestion than 'em_pd', so I'd say let's stick with that for now.

Thanks,
Quentin