Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263472AbTKWVZQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:25:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263468AbTKWVZQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:25:16 -0500 Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:33010 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263472AbTKWVZM (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:25:12 -0500 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: modular IDE in 2.4.23 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 22:26:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200311232123.06635.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <20031123205635.GA20672@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20031123205635.GA20672@devserv.devel.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311232226.08882.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1557 Lines: 41 On Sunday 23 of November 2003 21:56, Alan Cox wrote: > > Uh. Oh. 2.4.23 IDE changes are obscure... Modular IDE breakage is caused > > by Alan's hotplug changes and is not easy to fix properly. > > The fixing is simply a matter of linkage ordering and function execution. > > Simple thought experiment > > Merge ide-probe into ide-core > Export a symbol for the second initializer function if used modular > Create a mini module that just invokes the exported function on init Update ide_probe_module() for new name of probe module. > You now have the same execution sequence but with the link problem removed. Hmm, actually you are right. Sorry :-). > > I would like to have these changes removed: > > (a) they break modular IDE > > (b) such changes should be first added to 2.6 and then backported to 2.4 > > (otherwise you are magically creating regression in 2.6) > > Its not my fault the 2.6 code is lagging badly, and I wrote the code 2.6 is not "lagging badly", this is a false statement. > because people using laptops, and people using ATA and SATA for business > expect basic functionality like hotplug to work. For most of them 2.6 > doesn't really matter and won't for another 6 months, but 2.4 matters right > now. I assume you will fix it 6 months from now in 2.6, right? :-) --bart - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/