Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263711AbTKXJuc (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:50:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263715AbTKXJub (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:50:31 -0500 Received: from host213-160-108-25.dsl.vispa.com ([213.160.108.25]:15533 "HELO cenedra.office") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263711AbTKXJua (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:50:30 -0500 From: Andrew Walrond To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Intel centrino drivers being withheld? Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:50:28 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311240950.28769.andrew@walrond.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1033 Lines: 26 Is anybody liasing, asisting or pressuring Intel wrt centrino wireless drivers? It seems to me that it could have been written at least 20 times over during the time they've supposedly been in development. This quote from back in March annoys me somewhat: "The Santa Clara, Calif., chip maker is running Linux drivers in its labs, but whether or not those drivers make it out of the labs depends on customer demand, said Scott McLaughlin, an Intel spokesman" Well, I am demanding, and my patience is running very thin. And Amd look to be releasing 64bit mobile parts soon, and appear to be very linux friendly. Am I the only one getting annoyed about this? Can anybody put my mind at rest, or suggest reasons why Intel may be reluctant to release the drivers? Andrew Walrond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/