Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp2352648imm; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 02:29:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV624EFa19w1GnIwMrQ/SxXRKIbbuwPkeWtgTUFnSAZWUAZGvqz3gx3M+KQoPc3wVoPK7SScI X-Received: by 2002:a63:4281:: with SMTP id p123-v6mr551312pga.91.1538558949627; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 02:29:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538558949; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ax85JrM1IGY4XuFDsrSNQuhodX5aK5hZw2vRpgJA0XrF1vOBXIaqSwlcsY2xRxHeiP c9nP3Rd6A76mFShqqWId7JuuouU9UaylFQdo0GqYxTNGaacEKml/IdtxQJvDwAsIIK4m aFyLg1p55efWhA+6m7bDmLXb9KYniYyAOvmSUbsL2I+9xiYS9yCSZsYm4+pdUW7TTTXm bekEI3vib8Rue2Mor+64ZOjg8ZVzBtXHBjzlRau69ZFWowqVeKH9RCuowyJ2zyxwcsLR 1tpFRZwlGIQp9hE3c0NFx1DekLyZNj0pI+kmHp1aE9nfIkk3k10iFd5ox3iL+B2W0Kue xBKQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=80L/btrPXFwP+QkR6XA7iPIo8OnteUXmSp15Lp6h5Ow=; b=gWDDYJJvE5LBxnhFF4RXU2AU7ZM18bjv2WQFPQCXI6ir5MhOfZ4X45931sRqARzgmR GeeO2tSQNfmB9C8VnwBNy5KbjWZDDm1ozCJwqG9jJJ7cWoilZ3uUa4PBZuronXHTHgMa nJU87/g3+cUunuawgTWdYEdZe6Cm9GjipYndAdEnqLMv/seOqBj4rly8OhPVzhmWfQbr 9UvTBeLNDmR2neqxeGexjIayECvmTRR1tUNbN1ZUIbrfpS+xPIFE3lJgm76A89gSl5WE v42E6OSq6IYiGcG4lPsa3WhviWy+pBopqKU0ARj73OP1JcNVLjsWv4+z4IMhsMA/1tRK 0yJg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u69-v6si872971pgd.353.2018.10.03.02.28.54; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 02:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727690AbeJCQQR (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Oct 2018 12:16:17 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:62756 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726712AbeJCQQR (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2018 12:16:17 -0400 Received: from 79.184.253.194.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (79.184.253.194) (HELO aspire.rjw.lan) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.148) id efea987198ef30d2; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 11:28:41 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Jason Baron , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] various dynamic_debug patches Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:25:40 +0200 Message-ID: <2308315.5DVx2N1Pa0@aspire.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <4563778.42gAD4asSf@aspire.rjw.lan> References: <20180919220444.23190-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <4563778.42gAD4asSf@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, September 20, 2018 10:05:00 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, September 20, 2018 12:04:22 AM CEST Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > This started as an experiment to see how hard it would be to change > > the four pointers in struct _ddebug into relative offsets, a la > > CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS, thus saving 16 bytes per > > pr_debug site (and thus exactly making up for the extra space used by > > the introduction of jump labels in 9049fc74). I stumbled on a few > > things that are probably worth fixing regardless of whether the latter > > half of this series is deemed worthwhile. > > > > Patch relationships: 1-2, 3-4, 5-6 and 15-16 can be applied > > individually, though 2, 4 and 6 probably makes most sense in the > > context of the final goal of the series. > > OK, I can take the [15-16/22] separately. And they have been applied now. Thanks, Rafael