Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1538582206.205649.21.camel@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] lib/scatterlist: sgl API fixes and cleanups
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To:     Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Date:   Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:56:46 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20180926141625.17727-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
References: <20180926141625.17727-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-7"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 15:16 +-0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
+AD4 From: Tvrtko Ursulin +ADw-tvrtko.ursulin+AEA-intel.com+AD4
+AD4 
+AD4 Mostly same fixes and cleanups I've sent earlier in the year, but with some
+AD4 patches dropped and some split into smaller ones as per request.

I think in order for a patch series to get noticed that the maintainer the
series is sent to should appear in the +ACI-To+ACI field of the e-mail. If you
resend this patch series, please Cc the linux-block mailing list and please
also use my current e-mail address. I only noticed this patch series today
because my old e-mail address occurs in the Cc list of this patch series.

Thanks,

Bart.