Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:48:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:48:46 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:55046 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:48:37 -0500 Message-ID: <3ABE023A.10D2FE24@evision-ventures.com> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 16:35:38 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, hpa@transmeta.com, tytso@MIT.EDU, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Larger dev_t In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > > > > We need a size, and I am strongly in favor of sizeof(dev_t) = 8; > > this is already true in glibc. > > The fact that glibc is a quivering mass of bloat, and total and utter crap > makes you suggest that the Linux kernel should try to be as similar as > possible? > > Not a very strong argument. > > There is no way in HELL I will ever accept a 64-bit dev_t. > > I _will_ accept a 32-bit dev_t, with 12 bits for major numbers, and 20 > bits for minor numbers. > > If people cannot fit their data in that size, they have some serious > problems. And for people who think that you should have meaningful minor > numbers where the bit patterns get split up some way, I can only say "get > a frigging clue". That's what you have filesystem namespaces for. Don't > try to make binary name-spaces. > > And I don't care one _whit_ about the fact that Ulrich Drepper thinks that > it's a good idea to make things too large. Amen. It's entierly sufficent to take a size similiar to the one on systems which don't have the problems linux has in this area. Our daily motto should be: "Maybe we don't know a shit about OS design - but we known very well up to the ground how Solaris works." Please forgive me If I stressed your sense of humour a bit too much :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/